Skip to main content

Security report for dvorce.cz

DVORCE TŘEBOŇ s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Penzion Dvorce is a small hospitality business located in the South Bohemian region of the Czech Republic, offering accommodation and dining services with a focus on biofarm products and family-friendly experiences. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting families, couples, and tourists interested in nature and regional cuisine. The business model integrates accommodation, restaurant services, and gift voucher sales, positioning itself as a regional eco-friendly hospitality provider. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site is served over HTTPS with valid SSL, but lacks some security headers and formal privacy and terms of service pages, which are areas for improvement. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some level of privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment. The site uses tracking pixels from Facebook and Google Analytics, with moderate user tracking levels. Overall, the website is safe, family-friendly, and professionally maintained, but could enhance compliance and security transparency. Recommendations include publishing privacy and terms policies, adding security headers, implementing a security.txt file, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dvorce.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector with a niche focus on eco-friendly biofarm products and family-oriented services. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating farm-to-table dining with accommodation in a scenic natural setting. Revenue streams include room bookings, restaurant services, and online gift voucher sales. The target customers are families, couples, and tourists seeking authentic regional experiences. The company maintains partnerships with its website developer and operates an e-commerce subdomain. Growth indicators include active social media presence and multimedia content showcasing local attractions. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen compliance and security posture to enhance market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and terms policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. Tracking technologies are used responsibly with consent mechanisms, but data retention policies are not disclosed. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DVORCE TŘEBOŇ s.r.o.
Registration number
041 37 540
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DVORCE TŘEBOŇ s.r.o.
Description
Penzion Dvorce is a guesthouse located in the South Bohemian region of the Czech Republic, offering accommodation on a farm near ponds Svět and Rožmberk. It is ideal for family vacations, friends gatherings, or romantic stays. The accommodation includes half-board with buffet meals featuring specialties from their biofarm.
Key services
Accommodation in rooms and apartments, Restaurant with biofarm specialties, Biofarm with Charollais cattle, Gift vouchers, Tourist and cycling trip guidance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Owl Carousel, Datepicker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about hospitality services.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with consent management.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  5. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts detected.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  8. Social media presence is active on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is family-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Owl Carousel, datepicker libraries, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The HTML structure is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and optimized images. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt is low, but the absence of security headers and formal compliance pages suggests opportunities for modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dvorce.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dvorce.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.