Skip to main content

Security report for duseli.lv

SIA Kempings Dūšeļi · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kempings Dūšeļi is a small Latvian hospitality business offering nature-based leisure services including holiday home rentals, boat rentals, and gift cards near Babītes lake close to Riga. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses common plugins such as WPBakery and Slider Revolution. It features localized content in Latvian, clear contact information, and customer testimonials from Facebook and Booking.com, indicating a trusted local presence. The technical infrastructure is moderate with HTTPS enforced and standard tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel implemented. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small hospitality business with room for security and privacy improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching duseli.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector targeting customers seeking a peaceful nature retreat near Riga. Its business model centers on direct rentals of holiday homes and boat services, supplemented by gift cards. The company leverages social proof through Facebook and Booking.com reviews to build trust. The website's content and structure support a local market focus with clear contact channels and social media engagement. The lack of WHOIS data limits external verification, but the presence of a Latvian registration number and consistent branding supports legitimacy. The business appears to be a small family-owned entity with a niche market position in leisure and tourism.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms via Contact Form 7, which is positive. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a cookie consent banner and incident response contact information indicates partial GDPR compliance and limited incident readiness. The use of third-party tracking pixels requires transparent privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve trust and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Kempings Dūšeļi
Registration number
40103803712
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Kempings Dūšeļi
Description
Atpūta pie dabas ar laikmetīgu gaumi un komfortu. Brīvdienu mājas ar visām ērtībām, laivu noma, sup dēļi. Miers kā laukos, bet pavisam tuvu Rīgai.
Key services
Holiday homes rental, Boat rental, Gift cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, WooCommerce 3.5.10, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery, Slider Revolution
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via script redirect
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with Contact Form 7 plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Pixel Caffeine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality site offering holiday homes and boat rentals near Babītes lake, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with localized contact information and social media presence.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no suspicious content detected.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, though privacy and terms pages exist.
  5. Uses standard tracking tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS enforced.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature WordPress 4.9.26 CMS with WooCommerce 3.5.10 for e-commerce functionality. It employs popular plugins like WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution for content and visual management. The tech stack includes jQuery and standard Google and Facebook tracking scripts. HTTPS is enforced via a JavaScript redirect. Performance is moderate with caching and optimization plugins implied by autoptimize CSS usage. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and screen reader text present. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with duseli.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review duseli.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.