Skip to main content

Security report for dunamsz.hu

Duna Médiaszolgáltató Nonprofit Zrt. · Media · Hungary

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Duna Médiaszolgáltató Nonprofit Zrt. operates as a Hungarian public media service provider delivering television, radio, and online content primarily targeting Hungarian-speaking audiences. The website serves as a portal for accessing media services and related information, reflecting a nonprofit business model with a strong public service orientation. The company is positioned as a key player in Hungary's media landscape, supported by partnerships with official entities such as MTVA. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern set of JavaScript libraries and plugins to support multimedia content delivery and user interaction. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support represents a critical security gap, exposing users to potential risks. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism but lacks explicit privacy, security, and incident response policies, which may affect compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires urgent security enhancements to protect user data and improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dunamsz.hu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the media sector as a nonprofit public broadcaster, offering a range of services including TV and radio channels and online streaming. Its market position is strong within Hungary, supported by official partnerships and a consistent brand presence. The business model focuses on public service rather than commercial revenue, which aligns with its nonprofit status. The website links to several partner domains, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators are not explicitly visible, but the use of modern web technologies and multimedia content suggests ongoing digital engagement efforts. The lack of visible contact information and detailed corporate disclosures on the site may limit direct customer engagement but is typical for public media entities.

Security posture

The website currently lacks HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability exposing all data transmissions to interception and manipulation. No advanced security headers or policies are implemented, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. While no known SSL vulnerabilities or exploitable libraries are detected, the absence of encryption and security best practices significantly lowers the security posture. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive indicator of privacy awareness, but overall compliance with GDPR and security frameworks is limited. Immediate implementation of SSL/TLS, security headers, and documented security policies is recommended to mitigate risks and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish clear privacy, security, and incident response policies accessible from the website footer.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility including official emails and phone numbers for user support and security reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.3.2 and uses a variety of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, Video.js, Mustache.js, and SoundManager2 to deliver rich multimedia content. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as a contrast toggle and keyboard navigation aids. DNS records show multiple A records hosted likely in Hungary with MX records pointing to official mail servers. However, the lack of SSL/TLS support is a major technical deficiency. Performance metrics are not available, but the site uses caching and CDN resources for scripts and styles. The technical stack is modern but requires security upgrades and performance monitoring to ensure reliability and safety.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dunamsz.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dunamsz.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.