Skip to main content

Security report for duffeypetrosky.com

DP+ (now part of Fusion92) · Media · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DP+ is a marketing and innovation company recently acquired by Fusion92, positioning itself as a Midwest marketing innovation powerhouse. The website serves primarily as a landing page to announce this acquisition and redirect visitors to Fusion92's main site for further information. The business targets organizations seeking marketing and brand innovation services, operating within the media sector. The site branding is consistent and professional, reflecting the parent company's identity. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, indicating a contemporary digital infrastructure. However, performance data is missing, and the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security shortfall. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. From a security perspective, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and TLS protocols severely impacts the security posture. While some security headers are present, critical best practices like OCSP stapling, session resumption, and comprehensive HSTS policies are missing. No privacy or cookie policies are actively presented on the landing page, and no contact or incident response information is available, limiting compliance and user trust. Overall, the website presents moderate business credibility but suffers from critical security issues that must be addressed urgently. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment, privacy compliance, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching duffeypetrosky.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DP+ operates as a marketing innovation firm with a focus on brand strategy and digital marketing, now integrated under Fusion92. The acquisition strengthens Fusion92's market position in the Midwest, expanding its service offerings and client base. The business model revolves around providing marketing services to other businesses, leveraging digital platforms and creative innovation. The partnership ecosystem includes Mimecast for email security and Vercel for hosting. Growth indicators include the recent acquisition and rebranding efforts. The company targets medium-sized enterprises and organizations seeking marketing innovation. Competitive advantages include the backing of Fusion92's resources and brand recognition. Revenue streams likely derive from marketing contracts and consulting services. The website's minimal content suggests a strategic focus on redirecting traffic to the parent company rather than standalone operations.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, which exposes users to potential interception and trust issues. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the absence of TLS protocols and certificate transparency compliance are significant gaps. The site lacks privacy compliance indicators such as cookie consent and GDPR-related disclosures. Incident response readiness is not evident, with no security contact channels or policies published. Data protection practices are minimal, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The security culture appears immature, likely due to the site serving as a simple landing page rather than a full-service portal. Business impact includes potential loss of user trust and SEO penalties due to missing HTTPS, as well as compliance risks under GDPR and other privacy regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance security headers and enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Develop a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible security practices and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, which supports scalable and performant deployments. However, performance metrics are missing, indicating a lack of monitoring or reporting. The site uses multiple preloaded fonts and asynchronous scripts to optimize loading. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility features are limited but mobile optimization is good. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site approach. Technical risks include the lack of HTTPS and incomplete security configurations, which could impact user trust and search engine rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with duffeypetrosky.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review duffeypetrosky.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.