Skip to main content

Security report for dsadvokati.cz

Doucha Šikola advokáti s.r.o. · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Doucha Šikola advokáti s.r.o. is a specialized law firm based in the Czech Republic focusing on energy law and commercial legal services. The firm supports projects in renewable energy and provides comprehensive legal advice in areas such as contract law, mergers and acquisitions, and intellectual property protection. Their market position is strengthened by partnerships with key industry associations and a portfolio of notable clients. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including animation libraries and Google Tag Manager, offering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent and privacy policy in place, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response contacts. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly reduces trust from a domain registration perspective but the professional content and client testimonials support legitimacy. Overall, the website is well-designed, content-rich, and trustworthy for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dsadvokati.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dsadvokati.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dsadvokati.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the energy sector, targeting businesses and entrepreneurs requiring legal expertise in energy and commercial law. Their competitive advantage lies in deep sector knowledge, long-term experience since 2010, and strong industry partnerships. The business model revolves around providing specialized legal services and consulting for energy projects, particularly renewable sources. The presence of client testimonials and partner logos indicates a solid reputation and active engagement in the market. Growth indicators include recent collaborations and involvement in projects totaling significant energy capacity. The firm maintains a professional online presence with multilingual support and client zone access, suggesting a client-focused approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, there is no evidence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, and no published security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but may be due to privacy protection or registry restrictions. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a professional services website but could be improved by adding explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and enhanced HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and improve SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and compliance with best practices.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize risk from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Doucha Šikola advokáti s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ04442687
Registration number
04442687
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Doucha Šikola advokáti s.r.o.
Description
Advokátní kancelář specializující se na právo a energetiku, poskytující právní služby v oblasti obchodního práva, energetického práva a obnovitelných zdrojů energie.
Key services
Právní poradenství v energetice, Obchodní právo, Smluvní právo, Fúze a akvizice, Ochrana duševního vlastnictví
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Tippy.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with explicit user choice
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues.
  3. Strong focus on energy law and related legal services.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and user experience features.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies found.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  8. Multiple client testimonials and partner logos enhance trust.
  9. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  10. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries such as AOS for animations and Tippy.js for tooltips. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for accessibility and SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies. The site includes embedded Google Maps for contact location. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dsadvokati.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dsadvokati.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.