Skip to main content

Security report for drmax.eu

Dr. Max Holding · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dr. Max Holding operates as a leading pharmaceutical group headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic, with a significant presence across 17 European countries. It is the second largest pharmacy chain in Europe and focuses on retail pharmacies, e-commerce, wholesale distribution, and marketing services for strategic partners. The website reflects a mature business with a clear market position and a broad service offering in the healthcare sector. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager with IP anonymization, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in security posture and privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for large enterprises, but limits direct verification of domain registration details. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drmax.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dr. Max Holding's market positioning as a dominant pharmacy chain in Central and Eastern Europe and the second largest in Europe highlights its competitive advantage. The business model combines brick-and-mortar retail, e-commerce, and wholesale distribution, targeting a broad consumer base across multiple countries. The company leverages strategic partnerships for marketing and sales, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The website content and structure support a large enterprise with extensive operations. Growth indicators include expansion into new markets and a large employee base. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains in the provided data limits further ecosystem analysis.

Security posture

The current security posture shows moderate maturity. The use of HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, which is a positive privacy practice. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely security communication. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site is functional but should enhance security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security communication.
  4. Verify and document SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dr. Max Holding
Description
Dr. Max Group is a Central and Eastern European business group operating in pharmaceutical sector. Headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic, the group currently stands as the 2nd largest pharmacy chain in Europe, dominating the CEE region. They provide accessibility, affordability, high-quality products and customer-centered approach in brick&mortar pharmacies, e-shop pharmacies and wholesale distribution systems.
Key services
Retail pharmacies, E-shop pharmacies, Wholesale distribution, Marketing and sales for strategic partners
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery Migrate 3.4.1, Owl Carousel 2.1.3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  4. Contact information limited to physical address; no emails or phone numbers explicitly found.
  5. Uses standard analytics and marketing tools with IP anonymization.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. No forms detected in provided HTML snippet.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a standard modern JavaScript stack with jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing, with IP anonymization enabled. The site uses Google Fonts and CDN-hosted CSS/JS libraries, indicating a reliance on third-party services for performance and design. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate with video content and interactive maps, which may impact load times. Accessibility and SEO are basic to good but could be improved with additional semantic markup and ARIA attributes. The technical debt is low but security and privacy implementations require strengthening to meet enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drmax.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drmax.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.