Skip to main content

Security report for drinkag1.com

AG1 · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AG1 is a prominent global health and wellness company specializing in daily foundational nutrition supplements, particularly greens powders trusted by athletes and health enthusiasts. The company has a strong market position with a large customer base and recognized certifications, supported by a professional and well-branded website. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Next.js, React, and cloud hosting, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools with a consent management system, although explicit privacy and cookie policies are not clearly linked on the analyzed page. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and publishing security policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drinkag1.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AG1 operates a direct-to-consumer e-commerce business model focused on health supplements, targeting athletes and wellness consumers globally. The company benefits from strong brand recognition, multiple subsidiaries, and strategic funding partners. Its digital presence is mature, with extensive use of analytics and marketing platforms to drive customer engagement. The business shows growth potential and market leadership in the nutrition supplement sector, supported by certifications and media coverage. The absence of visible privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for compliance improvement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and consent management integration. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site would benefit from enhanced transparency on security practices and a formal vulnerability disclosure channel to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies on the website.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  5. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AG1
Description
AG1 (formerly Athletic Greens) is a global health and wellness company which produces a daily Foundational Nutrition supplement that supports whole body health.
Key services
Daily foundational nutrition supplement, Health and wellness support products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, AppLovin, RudderStack Analytics, Ketch Consent Management
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
AWS (Amazon Route 53 DNS), Vercel (hosting inferred from _next static paths)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • Consent management implemented via Ketch

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Klaviyo, RudderStack
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AppLovin
Tracking pixels
Klaviyo, RudderStack Analytics, Axon.ai, Albss.com, Gladly Chat SDK, Ketch Consent Management
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, RudderStack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong brand presence with consistent branding and social media integration.
  3. Comprehensive use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. No visible security or privacy policy pages found on the analyzed page.
  5. Consent management implemented but no explicit cookie or privacy policy links detected.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Next.js framework hosted likely on Vercel with AWS DNS services. It uses a comprehensive set of analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, RudderStack, and AppLovin for advertising. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with extensive use of preloading and font optimizations. The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve DNS security and formalize privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drinkag1.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drinkag1.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.