Skip to main content

Security report for drfeldmanis.lv

DR.FELDMAŅA PRIVĀTKLĪNIKA · Healthcare · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DR.FELDMAŅA PRIVĀTKLĪNIKA is a specialized plastic surgery private clinic located in Dreiliņi, near Riga, Latvia. Founded in 2008, it offers a range of cosmetic and reconstructive surgical services including body, breast, and facial plastic surgeries, as well as beauty injections and Med SPA procedures. The clinic is led by Dr. Kaspars Feldmanis, a plastic surgeon with over 20 years of international experience. The website targets individuals seeking professional plastic surgery and aesthetic treatments, emphasizing quality care and modern technology.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drfeldmanis.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic positions itself as a reputable local healthcare provider with a focus on personalized patient care and advanced surgical techniques. Its business model revolves around private medical services with a steady patient volume exceeding 1000 annually. The website supports multilingual content (Latvian, Russian, English) to cater to a broader audience. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube supports marketing and patient engagement. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security tokens in forms, indicating basic security hygiene. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency in security management. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking, but privacy compliance mechanisms like cookie consent banners are missing. The overall security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
  3. Develop and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider DNSSEC deployment and WHOIS privacy transparency to strengthen domain security and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DR.FELDMAŅA PRIVĀTKLĪNIKA
Description
Plastiskais ķirurgs dr.Kaspars Feldmanis. Privātklīnika piedāvā plastiskās ķirurģijas pakalpojumus, atrodas Rīgas pievārtē, Dreiliņos, darbojas kopš 2008. gada, ar vairāk nekā 1000 pacientiem gadā.
Key services
ķermeņa plastiskās operācijas, krūšu plastiskās operācijas, sejas plastiskās operācijas, skaistuma injekcijas, med SPA procedūras
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, WPBakery Page Builder, Ultimate Social Media Icons, Buttonizer, NextGEN Gallery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional plastic surgery clinic site in Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured and multilingual support is present (LV, RU, EN).
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found despite GDPR page presence in menu.
  4. Contact information includes a company email and contact form but no phone number explicitly found.
  5. Uses multiple WordPress plugins and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a variety of plugins including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, WPBakery Page Builder, and Ultimate Social Media Icons. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drfeldmanis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drfeldmanis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.