Dresden Marketing GmbH · Media · Germany
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.
Dresden Magazin is the official city magazine for the Dresden Elbland region, published by Dresden Marketing GmbH. It provides rich content focused on culture, events, gastronomy, family, and leisure activities, targeting residents and visitors interested in the region. The website is well-branded, professionally designed, and consistently maintained, reflecting a strong regional marketing presence supported by public funds. The business model centers on content publishing and regional promotion, leveraging digital media and social channels to engage its audience. Technically, the website runs on WordPress 6.8.1 with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium and Borlabs Cookie for SEO and privacy compliance. It uses jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive elements and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and accessibility features, although some accessibility aspects could be improved. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS servers suggest a reputable provider. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not explicitly detected, indicating room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business, showing a domain age appropriate for the company's history. Overall, Dresden Magazin presents a trustworthy, professional, and secure online presence with strong compliance to privacy regulations. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to further enhance security posture and trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention dresden-magazin.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dresden-magazin.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with dresden-magazin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dresden-magazin.com.