Skip to main content

Security report for drenthecampings.nl

Drenthe Campings · Hospitality · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Drenthe Campings is a specialized hospitality business focused on providing camping and accommodation services in the Drenthe region of the Netherlands. The company offers a variety of camping experiences including family-friendly sites, camper campings, and unique overnight stays such as treehouses and themed lodgings. Their market position is that of a niche regional provider emphasizing quality and guest hospitality. Technically, the website is built on a custom CMS (TenZer) and integrates modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for compliance and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data for SEO and social media presence. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive cookie policy and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drenthecampings.nl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates an online booking platform targeting campers and families interested in nature-oriented camping in Drenthe. Their competitive advantage lies in offering unique camping experiences and a curated selection of quality campings. Revenue streams likely include booking commissions and accommodation rentals. The company maintains a Facebook presence and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating a focused small business operation. The website content and branding are consistent and tailored to their niche market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. Tracking and advertising scripts are managed with user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. The site does not publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. Overall, the security measures align with industry best practices for small hospitality websites but could be enhanced for greater resilience and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  4. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Drenthe Campings
Description
Drenthe Campings offers camping and rental accommodations in Drenthe, including boscampings, family campings, and camper campings. They emphasize quality, hospitality, and unique camping experiences including special overnight stays like treehouses and more.
Key services
Camping place bookings, Accommodation rentals, Special overnight stays (e.g., treehouses, unique lodgings)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, Unite Gallery, Revolution Slider, Bootstrap 3.3.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern cookie consent management with Cookiebot.
  2. Multiple analytics and marketing tools are integrated for user tracking and advertising.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  5. Structured data is implemented for SEO and social media integration.
  6. No terms of service page detected in the analyzed content.
  7. Website content is in Dutch with multilingual support via hreflang tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.1, and specialized plugins like Unite Gallery and Revolution Slider, indicating a moderately modern but somewhat legacy tech stack. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The CMS appears to be a custom or niche solution (TenZer) tailored for the recreation sector. No major technical debts or risks were identified, but updating Bootstrap and jQuery versions could improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drenthecampings.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drenthecampings.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.