Skip to main content

Security report for draugiem.lv

Draugiem.lv · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Draugiem.lv is a leading Latvian social networking platform, offering users the ability to connect, share media, and participate in community activities. The website is well-branded and localized for the Latvian market, positioning itself as the primary domestic social network. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript and CSS assets served from a dedicated hosting domain, with HTTPS enforced and basic security measures like Content-Security-Policy in place. However, the absence of visible privacy, cookie, and security policies indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate, with room for improvement in headers and vulnerability disclosures. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and maintains a moderate trust level based on WHOIS and technical observations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of draugiem.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching draugiem.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets Latvian internet users seeking social networking services, leveraging a community-driven business model. It holds a strong market position as the first and most popular local social network. The business model likely relies on user engagement and possibly advertising or premium services, though no explicit monetization details are visible. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a focus on local content. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The ecosystem includes hosting and content delivery via ifrype.com. The lack of explicit contact or compliance information suggests potential areas for operational maturity enhancement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a Content-Security-Policy header to upgrade insecure requests, which is a positive security practice. JavaScript error reporting is implemented, indicating active monitoring of client-side issues. However, the absence of additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, limiting transparency for security researchers. No contact channels for incident response are visible. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formalized security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Draugiem.lv
Description
Draugiem.lv ir Latvijas pirmā un populārākā pašmāju sociālā tīkla vietne. Reģistrējies, veido draudzīgas saites un izmanto citas portāla sniegtās iespējas.
Key services
Social networking, Messaging, Photo and video sharing, Events, Groups
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SVG icons, CSS, RPC calls
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • JavaScript error reporting

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian social networking platform with localized content and language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies were found in the provided HTML content.
  3. HTTPS is enforced with upgrade-insecure-requests CSP header.
  4. JavaScript error reporting is implemented via RPC calls.
  5. No explicit contact information or security policies are visible on the main page.
  6. External resources are primarily loaded from ifrype.com, likely a hosting or CDN provider.
  7. No advertising or analytics scripts explicitly detected in the provided content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
  9. Content is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit material.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with CSS and SVG icons, served primarily from ifrype.com, which likely acts as a CDN or hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and includes error reporting mechanisms. Performance appears moderate, with room for optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph properties present but no advanced structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical stack is stable but could be enhanced with modern frameworks and improved SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100 −4Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 64/100 −2Medium31 findingsView report
  3. 66/100 +1Medium26 findingsView report
  4. 65/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with draugiem.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review draugiem.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.