Skip to main content

Security report for dors.dk

The secretariat of the danish economic councils · Government relations · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

5 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
2of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high in the checks that completed. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dors.dk

Only DNS and email could be checked this time. Monitoring re-checks every day and emails you when something material changes.

Daily monitoring

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a key position as an official government advisory body in Denmark, focusing on economic and environmental economic policy. Its business model revolves around providing independent analysis and advice, supported by comprehensive reports and public engagement through conferences and publications. The website reflects a medium-sized entity with a clear government affiliation, targeting policymakers, researchers, and the public. The presence of official contact details, physical addresses, and consistent branding reinforces credibility. The use of open-source CMS and privacy-focused analytics indicates a strategic approach to digital presence and data privacy. No commercial advertising or affiliate programs are detected, consistent with its government advisory role.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, appropriate security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of Matomo analytics with cookies disabled and Do Not Track enabled shows a commitment to user privacy. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. No signs of malware, phishing, or WAF blocking were detected, indicating a clean and secure environment. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced documentation and user communication regarding security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to ensure full GDPR compliance regarding user consent for cookies.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user rights and obligations when using the website.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update CMS and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
De Økonomiske Råd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
De Økonomiske Råd
Description
De Økonomiske Råd består af Det Økonomiske Råd og Det Miljøøkonomiske Råd. Rådenes fælles formandskab leverer uafhængig rådgivning til landets økonomiske og miljøøkonomiske beslutningstagere.
Key services
Economic and environmental economic policy advice, Publication of reports and analyses, Organization of conferences, Dissemination of research and working papers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 11, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Do Not Track enabled in analytics
  • Cookies disabled in analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong presence of official contact information and physical addresses.
  4. Use of Drupal CMS and Matomo analytics indicates modern and privacy-conscious technology choices.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy gaps except for cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy found.
  7. Social media presence includes X (Twitter) and Bluesky links.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dors.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dors.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.