Skip to main content

Security report for dontbreakme.com

Aylo Premium Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mofos.com is a large-scale adult entertainment website operated by Aylo Premium Ltd., specializing in amateur pornographic video content. The platform offers a subscription-based business model with extensive video libraries and a focus on amateur POV content. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure utilizing modern web technologies such as React and integrates third-party services for payments and analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and secure cookie usage, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of public WHOIS data slightly impacts trust but is likely justified due to privacy concerns inherent in adult entertainment businesses. Overall, the site is professionally managed and positioned as a reputable player in the adult media sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dontbreakme.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the adult media sector with a clear focus on amateur adult video content. Its market position is supported by a strong brand under Aylo Premium Ltd. Revenue streams are primarily subscription-based with additional affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships. The target audience is adults seeking amateur pornographic content. The company leverages partnerships with payment processors like Probiller and affiliate networks such as AdultForce. The website's design and content strategy emphasize user engagement and legal compliance, supporting sustainable growth and market presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie practices. Security headers are partially implemented, with room for improvement in Content-Security-Policy and clickjacking protections. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, indicating a compliance-aware security culture. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, suggesting an area for enhancement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional header hardening and transparency in security processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce a robust Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS risks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options or equivalent to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aylo Premium Ltd.
Description
Mofos.com offers thousands of amateur porn videos featuring popular pornstars, focusing on amateur POV content.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Membership access, Content categories and models browsing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, JavaScript ES6+, Probiller payment gateway, Google Analytics
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies for authentication
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky
Marketing tools
TrafficJunky, Probiller
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed adult entertainment platform
  2. Clear legal disclaimers and age verification present
  3. Uses multiple third-party services for payments and analytics
  4. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  5. WHOIS data unavailable publicly, possibly due to privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with integration of Google Fonts and multiple JavaScript bundles for navigation, filtering, and listing content. It employs third-party services for payments (Probiller) and analytics (Google Analytics). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but present. The hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The technical stack supports a scalable and interactive user experience suitable for streaming adult content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dontbreakme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dontbreakme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.