Doneer Je Ervaring is a Dutch non-profit initiative operated under the umbrella of the Dutch Cancer Society (NFK) and affiliated cancer patient organizations. It focuses on collecting and analyzing experiences and opinions from cancer patients, their relatives, and healthcare providers through online questionnaires. The platform serves as a valuable tool for research and advocacy to improve cancer care and patient quality of life in the Netherlands. The website is well-branded, professionally designed, and provides clear pathways for participation and information dissemination. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics with IP anonymization, Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, and media players for enhanced user engagement. While the site is performant and mobile-optimized, it lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear cookie and privacy policies and consent mechanisms. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is provided, which could be a gap in transparency. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with a strong focus on user privacy and data protection, aligned with its healthcare and non-profit mission.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention doneerjeervaring.nl, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for doneerjeervaring.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The website positions itself as a key player in the Dutch cancer patient advocacy and research ecosystem, leveraging partnerships with NFK, KWF, and Roparun. Its business model is centered on non-profit patient engagement and data collection for research purposes. The target audience includes cancer patients, their families, and healthcare professionals. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its established network of 22 patient organizations and its focus on collecting real-world patient experiences. Revenue streams likely include funding from partner organizations and donations. The partnership ecosystem is strong, with visible collaborations enhancing credibility. The website's content and design reflect a professional and trustworthy organization with a clear mission to improve cancer care through patient input.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect its forms from automated abuse. IP anonymization in Google Analytics indicates attention to privacy. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents areas for improvement. No public security policy or incident response contacts were found, which limits transparency in security governance. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security.txt files. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional security controls and transparency measures.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
NFK (Dutch Cancer Society)
Description
Doneer Je Ervaring is an instrument used by NFK and 22 affiliated cancer patient organizations to collect experiences, needs, and opinions from people who have or had cancer, their relatives, and sometimes healthcare providers via online questionnaires.
Key services
Online questionnaires, Experience collection, Patient panel management, Research dissemination
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Swiper.js (slider), Plyr (media player), ReadSpeaker (text-to-speech)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Google reCAPTCHA on forms
IP anonymization in Google Analytics
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
Strong focus on cancer patient experience research.
Good use of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
Use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse.
No visible security policy or incident response information.
No phone number explicitly provided for contact.
No terms of service page detected.
No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, incorporating libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and Plyr for media playback. Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA are integrated for analytics and security respectively. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting details are not explicit, but the site is performant with moderate loading times. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The use of ReadSpeaker indicates accessibility enhancements for users with reading difficulties. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with doneerjeervaring.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review doneerjeervaring.nl.