Skip to main content

Security report for domaineforget.com

Le Domaine Forget de Charlevoix · Hospitality · Canada

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Le Domaine Forget de Charlevoix is a well-established international academy and festival specializing in music and dance, located in Quebec, Canada. The organization offers a variety of cultural and educational services including intensive training stages, a renowned summer festival, concerts, and accommodation facilities. Their target audience includes musicians, dancers, cultural tourists, and donors. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with good content quality and clear navigation, primarily in French with English options. Technically, the site uses ASP.NET MVC framework hosted likely on Microsoft Azure, with integrated analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security flaw, and does not implement advanced security headers or DNS security features. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit GDPR compliance indicators or a data protection officer contact. Overall, the website is functional and credible but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching domaineforget.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit cultural and educational entity with a medium-sized footprint in the hospitality and education sectors. Its business model revolves around offering cultural events, educational programs, and accommodation services, supported by donations and ticket sales. The website links to partner domains handling ticketing and donations, indicating a mature partnership ecosystem. The presence of multiple social media channels and a cookie consent banner shows awareness of digital marketing and privacy trends. The domain registration data aligns well with the organization's claims, supporting legitimacy. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital engagement and improving security posture to attract more international participants and donors.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of HSTS, and missing DNS security features such as DNSSEC and CAA records. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. While no known vulnerabilities or subdomain takeover risks were detected, the lack of secure HTTPS undermines user trust and data protection. The site uses modern tracking and marketing scripts but does not provide detailed privacy or data retention policies. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and enhancement of security headers are recommended to mitigate risks and comply with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to strengthen DNS security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Enhance security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  6. Improve privacy compliance by detailing GDPR adherence and appointing a Data Protection Officer if applicable.
  7. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for privacy and security risks.
  8. Optimize website performance metrics and accessibility features for better user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET MVC 5.2 framework and hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure, as inferred from IP and media URLs. It uses modern JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, performance data is missing, and no caching or optimization headers were detected. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is a major technical deficiency. The site appears to be custom-developed rather than using a common CMS. There is room for modernization by adopting HTTPS properly, improving accessibility, and enhancing performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with domaineforget.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review domaineforget.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.