Skip to main content

Security report for dokapica.lv

SIA "Romārs" · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dokapica.lv is the online presence of a small hospitality business, specifically a restaurant and pizzeria located in Liepāja, Latvia. The business offers a variety of food items including salads, vegetarian dishes, meat dishes, pizzas, and beverages including alcoholic drinks. The website is multilingual, supporting Latvian, English, Lithuanian, and Russian, targeting local residents and visitors. The business model focuses on dine-in, takeaway, and delivery services via the Wolt application. The company behind the site is identified as SIA "Romārs". The website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Avada theme and includes clear contact information and social media links, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dokapica.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector with a local market focus in Liepāja. It leverages digital channels for menu presentation and order facilitation, including integration with delivery platforms. The multilingual support indicates an intent to serve a diverse customer base. The business appears to maintain a moderate digital maturity with a modern CMS and some tracking via Jetpack. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests gaps in compliance. No WHOIS data was available to verify domain registration details, but the business branding and contact info are consistent. The company does not appear to have publicly listed subsidiaries or partners.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements and performance optimizations to enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Romārs"
Description
Restorāns/Picērija Liepājā piedāvā garšīgus ēdienus visiem, ar iespēju pasūtīt līdzņemšanai vai ar piegādi caur Wolt aplikāciju.
Key services
Ēdienkarte ar dažādiem ēdieniem, Alus karte, Atspirdzinošie dzērieni, Pusdienu ēdienkarte, Pasūtījumi līdzņemšanai un piegādei
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, MediaElement.js, Jetpack, WPML (multilingual plugin), Fusion Builder
Frameworks
Avada theme framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a local restaurant/pizzeria in Liepāja, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Lithuanian, Russian).
  3. Clear contact info with phone numbers and email provided.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; registrant info unknown.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking; site fully accessible.
  8. Site promotes food and alcoholic beverages; content safe but targeted to mature audience.
  9. Uses Jetpack for stats and tracking; minimal user tracking observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 using the Avada theme framework and several plugins including Jetpack and WPML for multilingual support. It uses jQuery and MediaElement.js for media handling. The site loads external resources from its own domain and WordPress-related domains. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported with meta tags and Open Graph data, though some OG image tags are empty. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small hospitality business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dokapica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dokapica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.