Skip to main content

Security report for docmedico-rezeption.de

Docmedico · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Docmedico operates a digital online reception platform targeting medical practices, clinics, and pharmacies in Germany. The website presents a professional and modern interface built on Bootstrap, offering services that digitize communication and optimize operational processes for healthcare providers. The company positions itself as a niche SaaS provider in the healthcare sector, focusing on improving team efficiency through digital tools. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and various marketing pixels, hosted on servers indicated by kasserver.com nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks security headers and explicit privacy policies. No contact or incident response information is visible, limiting transparency. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and suitable for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching docmedico-rezeption.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Docmedico targets healthcare providers with a SaaS model focused on digital reception and communication optimization. The business leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience and improve service delivery. The absence of detailed company registration or contact information on the site suggests a small-sized enterprise with a focused market presence. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics services indicates an active approach to customer acquisition and retention. The company’s market position appears specialized within the German healthcare digital solutions niche, with potential growth opportunities in expanding digital transformation in medical practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely security incident management. The presence of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface, necessitating regular security audits. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the website footer or header.
  2. Add security headers to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Docmedico
Description
Die Online-Rezeption für Praxen, Kliniken & Apotheken: Kommunikation digitalisieren, Prozesse optimieren & das Team spürbar entlasten. Jetzt testen!
Key services
Online reception, Digital communication, Process optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.7, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel (Facebook Pixel), Hubspot, Personio, Peertube, Spotify, Youtube, Google Maps
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hubspot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Meta pixel
Marketing tools
Hubspot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed consent categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools are used, including Matomo, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, and Hubspot.
  6. Website uses modern Bootstrap framework for responsive design.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Content is professional and healthcare focused, safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 5.3.7, ensuring responsive design and good mobile optimization. It integrates several analytics and marketing technologies including Matomo, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, and Hubspot, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting is provided via kasserver.com, a known hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading or technical debt. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could be enhanced with improved security headers and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with docmedico-rezeption.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review docmedico-rezeption.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.