Skip to main content

Security report for doaffiliate.net

DoAffiliate.net Ltd. · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Doaff.net operates as an affiliate marketing network specializing in finance and nutra campaigns, connecting publishers and advertisers globally. The company positions itself as an experienced player since 2011 with operations in over 60 countries and multiple offices worldwide. Their platform offers tracking and infrastructure solutions to maximize profits for their clients. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security policies. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, which impacts overall trust. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from improved transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching doaffiliate.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets affiliate marketers in finance and health/beauty sectors, offering CPS/CPL/CPA models. Its market position is stable with a decade of experience and a broad geographic footprint. The business model relies on connecting advertisers and publishers with tailored offers and tracking solutions. Partnerships with known financial brands enhance credibility. Revenue streams likely include commissions from affiliate campaigns. The company maintains a social media presence and a blog to engage its audience. Growth indicators include multi-country operations and multiple offices. Strategic observations suggest a focus on direct and in-house offers to maintain quality and control.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security awareness. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The lack of direct contact emails for security or abuse reporting reduces incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Add direct company contact emails and phone numbers for better communication and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DoAffiliate.net Ltd.
Description
Doaff.net is an affiliate network specializing in connecting publishers and advertisers, focusing on finance and nutra campaigns. They provide infrastructure and tracking solutions to maximize profit for their clients.
Key services
Affiliate network services, Tracking and analytics, Finance and nutra campaign offers, Publisher and advertiser support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.3, jQuery 3.4.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome 5.8.2, jQuery UI, Moment.js, Date Range Picker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adwords
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear focus on affiliate marketing in finance and nutra sectors.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or footer; contact is via contact form.
  4. Cookie consent popup is implemented and functional.
  5. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter is evident.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found, which is unusual for an active business website.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No certifications or vulnerability disclosure pages detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap 4.3 and jQuery 3.4.1, ensuring responsive design and interactive features. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS libraries including FontAwesome and jQuery UI. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with doaffiliate.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review doaffiliate.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.