Skip to main content

Security report for dnb.com

Dun & Bradstreet · Finance · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

73/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dun & Bradstreet operates as a leading provider of business data and analytics services, targeting enterprise clients to help them meet sales and marketing goals, manage supply chains, and mitigate credit risk. The company leverages nearly two centuries of expertise, positioning itself as a trusted authority in the finance and business intelligence sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with a focus on enterprise business users. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, utilizing modern analytics and consent management tools such as Google Tag Manager and TrustArc. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates moderate performance. However, some areas such as accessibility and SEO could be improved for better user experience and discoverability. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs a robust cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls, indicating good privacy compliance. The absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for enhancement in security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and privacy compliance. The main limitation is the lack of publicly available WHOIS data, which is likely due to registry privacy policies rather than malicious intent. Strategic improvements in security headers, accessibility, and transparency would further strengthen the site’s trustworthiness and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dnb.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dnb.com

This scan found 8 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dnb.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
33,942
Employees
132
Customers
33,480
Third parties
330
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-06-12 · 149 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for dnb.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –gw-ext.dnb.com2026-06-12
  • –adfs.dnb.com2026-06-11
  • –adfs.dnb.com2026-06-10
  • –adfs.dnb.com2026-06-06
  • –adfs.dnb.com2026-05-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dun & Bradstreet holds a strong market position as a provider of business data and analytics, serving enterprise clients globally. Their business model focuses on B2B services, offering critical insights for credit risk management, supply chain navigation, and marketing enablement. The company benefits from a long-established brand and a comprehensive service portfolio. The website’s integration with advanced marketing and consent tools reflects a mature digital presence. While direct contact information is not prominently displayed, the site’s trust indicators and privacy policies support a credible and compliant operation. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor transparency gap but does not detract from the company’s established reputation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent framework powered by TrustArc. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates active analytics tracking, balanced by user privacy controls. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for improvement. No forms or input fields were detected in the analyzed content, reducing attack surface. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs indicates limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the site is secure for typical business use but could enhance its security maturity by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and remediation.
  4. Enhance website accessibility compliance to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Improve SEO by adding structured data and more comprehensive meta tags to increase search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dun & Bradstreet
Description
Meet sales and marketing goals, navigate global supply chains, and mitigate credit risk with nearly two centuries of D&B business data and analytics expertise
Key services
Business data, Analytics, Credit risk mitigation, Supply chain navigation, Sales and marketing enablement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM, TrustArc Consent Management, jQuery, AEM (Adobe Experience Manager)
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is business-oriented and professional
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  6. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to registry privacy or restrictions
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and TrustArc for consent management, reflecting adherence to privacy regulations. The site loads a variety of JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Adobe Helix RUM for performance monitoring. The presence of canonical tags and viewport meta tags supports SEO and mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization opportunities in script loading and accessibility. No hosting provider details were discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical stack is modern and suitable for enterprise needs but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium18 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 80/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dnb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dnb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.