Skip to main content

Security report for dleds.com

Detas SpA - Divisione Dleds · Energy · Italy

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Detas SpA - Divisione Dleds is an Italian company specializing in the design and manufacture of advanced LED lighting solutions for street, industrial, office, and school environments. The company holds ISO9001 and ISO14001 certifications, indicating a commitment to quality and environmental management. Their website reflects a professional presence with clear product categories, technical resources, and multilingual support via Weglot, targeting business and public sector clients in the energy and transportation sectors. Technically, the website is built on Webflow, uses Cloudflare for hosting and CDN, and integrates modern web fonts and analytics tools. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols significantly weaken the security posture. Privacy policies are present but lack a cookie consent mechanism, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dleds.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on LED lighting manufacturing and technical lighting design services. Their market position is supported by proprietary optics technology and recognized certifications. The business model is product manufacturing combined with technical consulting. The website targets businesses and public entities requiring reliable and innovative lighting solutions. The presence of multilingual support and detailed product categorizations suggests a strategy for international reach. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand and trust signals such as certifications and technical glossaries. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of modern TLS protocols, which exposes users to potential data interception risks. The website uses Cloudflare but does not leverage its full security capabilities such as OCSP stapling or session resumption. Email security is weak with no DMARC record, increasing the risk of phishing or spoofing. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with policies present but no active cookie consent mechanism. The website uses secure cookie flags and HSTS header, which are positive practices. Overall, the security posture requires immediate attention to SSL/TLS and email authentication to reduce business risk.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or 1.3 to secure all website traffic.
  2. Implement DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records to protect email domains from spoofing and phishing.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a security.txt file with incident response contacts to improve security communication and trust.
  5. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption on the SSL configuration to improve performance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Detas SpA
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, hosted behind Cloudflare CDN, and uses modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Weglot for multilingual support. Analytics are handled by Plausible, a privacy-focused service. The site includes Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. Performance data is unavailable, but the site appears well-structured with good navigation and mobile optimization. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and security risk. The site uses secure cookie flags and HSTS header but misses advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dleds.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dleds.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.