Skip to main content

Security report for divimeistari.lv

Divi Meistari · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Divi Meistari is a small beauty salon business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in manicure, pedicure, gel nails, nail design, French manicure, and hairdressing services. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear information about their services and locations. The business targets local customers seeking quality beauty treatments in the city center. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and SiteGround Optimizer, hosted on SiteGround. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and safe for general audiences, with active social media engagement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain registration trust analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching divimeistari.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention divimeistari.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for divimeistari.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on beauty and grooming services. Its business model is service-based with physical salon locations. The website content and social media presence indicate a focus on quality and customer satisfaction, supported by customer reviews on Facebook. The company appears to be a small local player with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. Revenue streams likely come from direct service sales. The lack of detailed business registration info online suggests a small-scale operation. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media platforms and possibly local suppliers. Growth indicators are not explicit but the website's active maintenance and social media suggest ongoing business activity.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicates a low maturity in security governance. Privacy compliance is insufficient, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which may expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential HTTP security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance website security.
  3. Establish and communicate an incident response process including security contact information.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency about data collection and retention policies to build user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Divi Meistari
Description
Manikīrs, pedikīrs, gēla nagi, gelish nagi, nagu dizains, franču manikīrs, matu krāsošana. Skaistumkopšanas salons frizētava Rīgas centrā.
Key services
Manicure, Pedicure, Gel nails, Nail design, French manicure, Hair coloring, Hairdressing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO plugin, SiteGround Optimizer
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based beauty salon site with good content and design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is present but no email addresses explicitly found.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  8. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  9. No visible forms collecting sensitive data except a search form.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, using jQuery and Yoast SEO plugin for SEO optimization. It is hosted on SiteGround, leveraging their SiteGround Optimizer plugin for performance improvements. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user behavior. The HTML is well-structured with JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Performance is moderate, with some optimization evident but potential for improvement. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security headers and privacy mechanisms are missing, representing technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional and professional website but requires enhancements in security and privacy areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with divimeistari.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review divimeistari.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.