Skip to main content

Security report for dismasnhof.at

Dismasnhof · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dismasnhof is a hospitality business based in Austria, providing accommodation services likely targeted at general visitors and tourists. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and includes a professional cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, indicating good availability and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces transparency but is common for small hospitality businesses. Overall, the website demonstrates a good balance of business professionalism, privacy compliance, and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dismasnhof.at

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on accommodation services. The website targets a general audience, primarily German-speaking, with English language support available. The business model is straightforward, offering lodging and related hospitality services. The site shows consistent branding and good content quality, supporting a positive market position locally or regionally. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of phone numbers or physical addresses on the website may limit direct customer contact options but is partially mitigated by email availability. The company appears to maintain compliance with privacy regulations and uses modern web technologies.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes multiple security headers, enhancing protection against common web attacks. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicates awareness of GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The site uses third-party scripts for fonts and emojis, which should be regularly reviewed for security. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and incident contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information, such as a security or abuse email address.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities and updates.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dismasnhof
Description
Dismasnhof is a hospitality business offering accommodation and related services, likely a hotel or guesthouse located in Austria.
Key services
Accommodation, Hospitality services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Real Cookie Banner Pro, TranslatePress
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Real Cookie Banner Pro for privacy compliance.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive in German language.
  4. Contact information is limited to email only; no phone or physical address explicitly found in HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. No social media links or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. No WHOIS data available from NIC.AT, indicating privacy protection or data unavailability.
  8. Website content is hospitality focused, safe, and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No advertising or tracking services detected beyond cookie consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It uses Real Cookie Banner Pro for privacy compliance and TranslatePress for multilingual support. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Adobe Fonts and WordPress.org. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The technical stack is appropriate for a small hospitality business, balancing ease of use with compliance and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dismasnhof.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dismasnhof.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.