Skip to main content

Security report for disco.ac

DISCO S WAVE, INC. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DISCO S WAVE, INC. operates the website disco.ac, providing an all-in-one music management platform designed to help artists, rights holders, brands, and music supervisors organize, share, and discover music tracks efficiently. The company positions itself as a trusted SaaS provider in the media industry with a strong customer base and a focus on simplifying music catalog management and collaboration. The platform leverages AI-powered discovery tools and offers mobile applications on iOS and Android, reflecting a modern and accessible digital infrastructure. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, hosted likely on Cloudflare infrastructure, and integrates various analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, and Intercom for customer engagement. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, contributing to a high-quality user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and provides a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR compliance. However, it lacks publicly available security policies, incident response details, and vulnerability disclosure information, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection, which is common for commercial SaaS businesses but slightly reduces transparency. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-structured digital presence with moderate risk due to limited public registrant information and absence of explicit security disclosures. Strategic enhancements in transparency and security communication would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching disco.ac

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DISCO targets music industry professionals including music supervisors, rights holders, artists, and management teams, offering a SaaS platform that centralizes music catalog management, sharing, and discovery. Its competitive advantage lies in AI-powered discovery tools and a trusted reputation evidenced by partnerships with major industry players. Revenue likely derives from subscription plans, with a freemium model indicated by free trials. The company maintains a strong digital ecosystem with mobile apps and active social media channels, supporting growth and customer engagement. Strategic partnerships and a focus on workflow streamlining position DISCO well within the media technology sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and GDPR-aligned cookie consent. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are critical for transparency and trust in the SaaS industry. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of direct security contact channels and security.txt reduces readiness for incident handling and vulnerability reporting. Overall, security practices are solid but could be enhanced by publishing detailed security and privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
  5. Enhance data protection officer visibility and compliance documentation to align with GDPR and other regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DISCO S WAVE, INC.
Description
DISCO is the all-in-one music management platform to organize, share, and discover tracks. Trusted by artists, rights holders, brands, and music supervisors.
Key services
music catalog management, music sharing and collaboration, AI-powered music discovery, playlist creation, music file sharing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare Stream, Intercom, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating privacy protection
  3. Strong presence of social media and customer trust signals
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent mechanism
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No security policy or incident response info publicly available
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO. Hosting appears to be on Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. Integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with efficient image loading and caching strategies. No CMS detected, likely a custom or headless solution. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with disco.ac. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review disco.ac.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.