Skip to main content

Security report for directgroup.eu

Direct Group, s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Direct Group, s.r.o. is a large Czech financial and technology group operating multiple subsidiaries in insurance, payment services, and investments. The company serves both individual and business clients, emphasizing simplicity, speed, reliability, and friendliness in its offerings. The website reflects a mature and professional digital presence with a modern tech stack based on Next.js and React, and uses third-party services such as CookiePro for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent implemented but no clear privacy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the site is well-branded, consistent, and trustworthy, though improvements in transparency and security documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching directgroup.eu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention directgroup.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for directgroup.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The group holds a strong market position in the Czech Republic with consolidated revenue of 8.3 billion CZK and 900,000 clients as of 2023. Its business model revolves around a platform of subsidiaries offering insurance, payment processing, and investment products. The presence of multiple branded subsidiaries and partner domains indicates a diversified portfolio and strategic partnerships. The target audience includes both individuals and businesses, with a focus on delivering intuitive and reliable financial services. The company culture emphasizes professionalism and customer-centric values. The website content and linked domains confirm a well-established business ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which could impact trust and compliance. The use of modern frameworks and lack of exposed sensitive data are positive indicators. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels to enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure program (e.g., security.txt).
  4. Enhance SEO and privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and GDPR compliance measures.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Direct Group, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Direct Group, s.r.o.
Description
Direct Group is a business group operating in finance and technology sectors, offering services including insurance, payment solutions, and investments. It targets both individuals and businesses with a focus on simplicity, speed, reliability, and friendliness.
Key services
Insurance, Payment services, Investment management, Business financial solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, AWS S3 (for media hosting), CookiePro (cookie consent)
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookiePro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy protection and query limitations.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via CookiePro.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content.
  6. Multiple subsidiary and partner domains are linked and clearly branded.
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers were found in the visible content.
  8. Business information is presented mainly via branding and linked subsidiaries.
  9. Security headers and explicit security policies are not visible in the HTML content.
  10. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and optimized media delivery via AWS S3. It uses asynchronous script loading and preloading for fonts and critical assets, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and semantic HTML elements. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookiePro for consent management. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with directgroup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review directgroup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.