Skip to main content

Security report for digiteka.com

Digiteka Technologies · Media · France

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Digiteka Technologies is a France-based company specializing in video technology solutions for media brands and advertisers. Their platform offers comprehensive services including video capture, enrichment, management, distribution, streaming, and monetization. The company targets large media organizations seeking scalable and integrated video strategies. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client trust indicators. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, Swiper.js, and Google Tag Manager, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy and cookie policies are present, though cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digiteka.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention digiteka.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
26
Employees
0
Customers
15
Third parties
11
Weak passwords
8%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for digiteka.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Digiteka operates in the media and technology sectors, providing a B2B SaaS platform for video content management and monetization. Their business model focuses on delivering integrated video solutions to media companies and advertisers, leveraging tools like AdOps Bot and header bidding to optimize revenue. The company demonstrates a solid market position with a client base of large media brands, supported by visible trust signals such as client logos and professional contact information. The platform subdomains indicate a structured service ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by comprehensive service offerings and a focus on video strategy consulting. However, the lack of transparent WHOIS data may affect trust with some partners or clients.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communications, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the analysis. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through privacy and cookie policies, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a technology service provider but should be enhanced to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to ensure full GDPR compliance and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to build trust and demonstrate readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Digiteka Technologies
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digiteka Technologies
Description
Digiteka provides a comprehensive video technology platform supporting video capture, enrichment, organization, distribution, broadcasting, and monetization for media brands and advertisers.
Key services
Video players and streaming, Video capture and management platform, Video monetization tools including AdOps Bot and header bidding, Video distribution via syndication and APIs, Support and consulting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Swiper.js, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at media and advertising sectors.
  3. WHOIS data is missing which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools detected.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Swiper.js for interactive sliders, and jQuery for DOM manipulation. Google Fonts and Bootstrap Icons enhance visual appeal. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads external resources over HTTPS, indicating secure content delivery. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digiteka.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digiteka.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.