The Digital Power Network is a national coalition focused on policy advocacy for the Bitcoin ecosystem, emphasizing energy innovation and sustainability. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting stakeholders interested in advancing energy independence and decarbonization through Bitcoin mining. Technically, the site is built on Squarespace, leveraging modern web technologies and hosting, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises legitimacy concerns, though the professional presentation mitigates some risk. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention digitalpowernetwork.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for digitalpowernetwork.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The organization positions itself as a key player in the intersection of energy and digital assets, advocating for policies that support Bitcoin mining as a clean and efficient use of electricity. Its business model revolves around coalition building, education, and advocacy rather than direct commercial services. The presence of a notable industry figure's quote adds credibility. The site lacks explicit business contact details and formal policy documents, which may limit trust for some stakeholders. The use of Squarespace suggests a small to medium-sized operation focusing on outreach and awareness.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with HSTS, indicating a commitment to secure communications. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could protect against common web attacks. No forms or input fields reduce the attack surface, but the absence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented security policies.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
The Digital Power Network
Description
The Digital Power Network is the national coalition spearheading policy advocacy for the Bitcoin ecosystem. It aims to foster continued economic growth and a cleaner, more sustainable energy landscape, redefining energy accessibility and paving the way for a decarbonized future.
Key services
Policy advocacy, Education, Coalition building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Squarespace, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Plyr video player
Frameworks
Squarespace
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
HSTS enabled
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is built on Squarespace with professional design and clear navigation.
No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main pages.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or header.
Social media presence includes a link to X (formerly Twitter) account.
Video and images are hosted on Squarespace CDN.
No forms detected on the homepage or main sections.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
SSL and HSTS are properly configured.
Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its CMS and hosting services. It uses JavaScript libraries including Plyr for video playback and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, typical for a CMS-based site with rich media content. SEO metadata is present but could be more comprehensive. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with digitalpowernetwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalpowernetwork.com.