Skip to main content

Security report for digitalcontrolroom.com

Digital Control Room · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Digital Control Room is a specialized company providing automated compliance and digital asset monitoring solutions primarily for the pharmaceutical and life sciences sectors. Their platform enables clients to discover and audit digital content across multiple brands and languages, ensuring regulatory compliance and reducing risk. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for global oversight of distributed digital content, supported by client testimonials from top pharma companies and recognized by awards such as The Kings Awards for Enterprise Innovation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins like Breakdance and Yoast SEO, with jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, offering a professional user experience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent management, though there is room for improvement in implementing additional security headers and a dedicated security.txt file. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, and privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, warranting further verification. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility but should enhance transparency around domain registration and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 26 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitalcontrolroom.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Digital Control Room operates in a niche market focused on compliance automation for pharma and life sciences companies. Their business model revolves around providing SaaS solutions and consulting services that help clients maintain regulatory compliance for digital content globally. The company leverages partnerships and endorsements from industry leaders, enhancing its market position. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and professional services. The target customers are compliance managers, digital asset teams, and pharma companies seeking risk mitigation. Growth indicators include recent awards and multiple client testimonials. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and a vulnerability disclosure program, indicating a proactive approach to security and customer trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of security plugins. Cookie consent is managed with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for improvement. The presence of a vulnerability response program is a positive indicator of incident readiness. There is no dedicated security contact email visible, which could enhance incident response. Overall, the security posture is strong for a small enterprise but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  4. Establish a dedicated security contact email (e.g., security@digitalcontrolroom.com) to streamline incident reporting and response.
  5. Conduct regular third-party script audits to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are in use.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Digital Control Room Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Control Room
Description
At Digital Control Room, discover automated compliance, monitor online content and reduce risk.
Key services
Automated compliance monitoring, Digital asset discovery and auditing, Risk reduction for online content, Global oversight of digital content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Breakdance WordPress theme/plugin, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugin (All In One WP Security and Firewall)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on pharma and life sciences compliance automation
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management
  4. Contact information is clear and includes email, phone, and physical address
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement
  7. WHOIS data missing, which reduces domain trust score
  8. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Breakdance theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and All In One WP Security and Firewall for security enhancements. The front-end uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Swiper.js for interactive galleries and sliders. The site loads with moderate performance and is highly optimized for mobile devices, providing excellent accessibility and navigation clarity. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, though adding HTTP security headers would further improve the security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalcontrolroom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalcontrolroom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.