Skip to main content

Security report for diginet.lt

UAB „Diginet LTU“ · Media · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Diginet LTU is a Lithuanian digital media company established in 2003, operating several leading online portals in Lithuania including Autoplius.lt, Aruodas.lt, Skelbiu.lt, Cvbankas.lt, Paslaugos.lt, and Kainos.lt. These portals serve diverse audiences ranging from vehicle buyers, real estate seekers, job applicants, to consumers comparing prices. The company holds a strong market position in Lithuania's online classifieds and portal management sector, targeting both consumers and businesses. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.1 and integrates Google Analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is accessible, mobile responsive at a basic level, and employs HTTPS for secure communication. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding modern security headers and updating legacy libraries. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diginet.lt

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates multiple well-known Lithuanian portals, indicating a diversified portfolio and strong presence in the local digital media market. Its business model relies on advertising and classified listings, targeting a broad user base across sectors such as automotive, real estate, employment, and e-commerce. The partnerships and linked domains suggest a robust ecosystem of related services. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and clear contact information, supporting credibility. However, the absence of detailed WHOIS data limits full verification of domain ownership and age. The company’s growth potential is supported by its established portals and steady user traffic, but modernization of technical infrastructure and enhanced compliance could improve competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, the use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.7.1 poses potential security risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy further reduces the security maturity level. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement modern security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Upgrade legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery to current secure versions to reduce risk of exploitation.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB „Diginet LTU“
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB „Diginet LTU“
Description
Diginet LTU is a Lithuanian company operating since 2003, providing digital services and managing popular Lithuanian online portals such as Autoplius.lt, Aruodas.lt, Skelbiu.lt, Cvbankas.lt, Paslaugos.lt, and Kainos.lt. The company targets Lithuanian consumers and businesses seeking online classified ads, real estate listings, job portals, and price comparison services.
Key services
Online classified ads, Real estate listings, Job portal services, Price comparison platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.1, jQuery Easing, Superfish menu, jQuery UI ToTop, Camera slideshow plugin, Google Analytics (ga.js), OneTrust cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with OneTrust, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the homepage.
  5. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly presented in the footer.
  6. Multiple well-known Lithuanian portals are linked, indicating business partnerships or ownership.
  7. Use of older jQuery version (1.7.1) may pose security risks.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  9. Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection fields present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack centered around jQuery 1.7.1 and related plugins for UI and slideshow functionality. Google Analytics is integrated via the older ga.js script, and OneTrust manages cookie consent. The site is served over HTTPS, but no advanced security headers are present. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements, though mobile optimization is basic. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the source. Performance is moderate with room for improvement by updating scripts and optimizing assets. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata, which could enhance SEO and social sharing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, suggesting opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diginet.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diginet.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.