Skip to main content

Security report for dig-berlin.de

DiG Plus GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DiG Plus GmbH is a Berlin-based design and communication agency specializing in political and social themes with over 20 years of experience. Their services include campaign design, publishing, and product development, targeting political organizations and social groups. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a clear project portfolio and contact information. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by implementing security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. No blocking or WAF challenges were detected, and the domain appears legitimate and consistent with the business claims.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dig-berlin.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dig-berlin.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dig-berlin.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dig-berlin.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a niche position in the political and social communication sector in Germany, leveraging a service-based business model focused on design and campaign management. Their market presence is supported by a 20-year history and a portfolio of projects for political and social clients. The absence of social media links and analytics tools suggests a privacy-conscious or low-profile digital marketing approach. Contact details and physical address are clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS (implied by URL), obfuscates email addresses to reduce spam, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms is a GDPR compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DiG Plus GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DiG Plus GmbH
Description
Designbüro und Kommunikationsagentur in Einem, spezialisiert auf politische und gesellschaftliche Themen, mit Fokus auf Kampagnen, Verlag und eigene Produkte in Berlin.
Key services
Design and communication agency services, Campaign management, Publishing, Product development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap Icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed emails in raw form (email obfuscation via JavaScript)
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL but not confirmed in data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and focused on political/social communication design.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with obfuscated email to reduce spam.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism found despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious approach.
  7. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with German hosting and domain usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery, along with Bootstrap Icons for UI elements. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, which may reduce data-driven marketing capabilities but enhances privacy. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adopting modern JavaScript frameworks and improving accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dig-berlin.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dig-berlin.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.