Skip to main content

Security report for dietzel-univolt.com

DIETZEL GmbH · Energy · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dietzel GmbH is an established family-owned enterprise specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality electrical installation materials. With a strong international orientation and production facilities in Austria, Slovakia, and China, the company serves professionals in electrical installation, civil engineering, and related sectors. The website reflects a professional business with clear product categories, service offerings, and comprehensive contact information. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies and a proprietary CMS, but lacks proper HTTPS configuration, which is a critical security concern. Privacy compliance is well addressed with detailed cookie and privacy policies and a consent mechanism. The security posture is weak due to missing SSL/TLS and modern security headers, exposing the site to potential risks. Overall, the business appears legitimate and trustworthy, but urgent improvements in security infrastructure are recommended.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dietzel-univolt.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dietzel-univolt.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
18
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dietzel GmbH operates as a full-line distributor and manufacturer in the energy sector, focusing on electrical installation materials and civil engineering products. The company targets professional customers and maintains a multi-national presence with partner sites in the UK and Hungary. Its business model includes product manufacturing, catalog distribution, and customer service. The website content and structure support a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good market positioning. The presence of a dedicated job portal and multiple contact channels indicates operational maturity and customer engagement. The company leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently poor due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and important security headers like HSTS are missing. While cookies are set with HttpOnly flags and cache-control headers are present, the lack of encryption exposes users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site uses Google Tag Manager for tracking, which is privacy compliant but adds to the attack surface. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration is essential to improve security and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Add security headers such as HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  6. Audit and enhance form security with CSRF tokens and input validation.
  7. Regularly review third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.
  8. Improve website performance metrics to enhance user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DIETZEL GmbH
Registration number
FN 100672 y (Commercial Court Vienna)
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the evo42 CMS platform by Lemon42, with frontend technologies including Bootstrap, Select2, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The hosting IP suggests AWS infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses SVG icons extensively. However, performance data is missing or zero, indicating potential issues with resource loading or measurement. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a major technical deficiency. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses cookie consent management with detailed cookie categorization and user control. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 36/100High27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dietzel-univolt.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dietzel-univolt.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.