Skip to main content

Security report for diabetes-und-recht.de

DiabetesUndRecht · Healthcare · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DiabetesUndRecht is a specialized legal consultancy website providing expert legal advice for people with diabetes, focusing on issues such as driving licenses, disability rights, school accompaniment, care levels, medical aids, and labor law. The business operates primarily in Germany and targets individuals affected by diabetes who require legal support. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, offering a niche service with a strong reputation supported by the credentials of RA Oliver Ebert, including membership in relevant committees and extensive publications. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the Gantry5 framework, with common plugins like Contact Form 7 and Borlabs Cookie for consent management. The hosting uses GoDaddy DNS servers, and the site enforces HTTPS with good SEO practices. Mobile optimization and accessibility are adequate, though some improvements in accessibility could be made. Performance is moderate, suitable for the site's content and audience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and documented security policies or incident response plans. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is noted. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and policies. The overall risk assessment is low, with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility. The website demonstrates a trustworthy and professional presence in its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diabetes-und-recht.de

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
43
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market segment providing legal advice specifically tailored to people with diabetes in Germany. Its competitive advantage lies in the specialized expertise of RA Oliver Ebert, who has decades of experience, committee memberships, and a strong publication record. The business model is consultancy-based, likely generating revenue through client appointments and legal services. The target customers are individuals with diabetes facing legal challenges related to disability, driving, school, and employment. Growth indicators include active blogging, publications, and lectures. The partnership ecosystem is limited but includes social media presence on Facebook. The company operates as a small-sized entity with no subsidiaries or parent companies identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via a reputable plugin. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could impact preparedness for security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent. The security culture appears basic but adequate for the business size and sector.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DiabetesUndRecht
Description
Rechtsberatung für Menschen mit Diabetes
Key services
Legal advice on diabetes and driving license, Disability rights and Schwerbehinderung, School and kindergarten accompaniment, Care level (Pflegegrad) for children, Medical aids and insurance, Labor law related to diabetes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, Gantry5 framework, Contact Form 7 plugin, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Font Awesome icons
Frameworks
Gantry5
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs and resource links)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented (Borlabs Cookie)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact forms use Contact Form 7 plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie (consent management)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a specialized legal consultancy focused on diabetes-related legal issues in Germany.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and relevant topics.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with Gantry5 framework and common plugins.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is used.
  6. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML; phone number provided in JSON-LD.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No incident response or security policy information found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with the Gantry5 framework, leveraging popular plugins such as Contact Form 7 for forms and Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The use of jQuery and Font Awesome is standard for UI enhancements. The site is hosted with DNS managed by GoDaddy (domaincontrol.com). Performance is moderate, with responsive design and mobile optimization in place. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but improvements could be made in security headers and accessibility compliance to modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diabetes-und-recht.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diabetes-und-recht.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.