Skip to main content

Security report for diabetes-psychologie.de

Diabetes & Psychologie e.V. · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Diabetes & Psychologie e.V. is a specialized non-profit association in Germany dedicated to addressing the psychosocial and psychological aspects of diabetes care. The organization provides educational webinars, annual conferences, certification modules, and resources targeted at both people affected by diabetes and healthcare professionals, particularly psychologists and psychotherapists. The website reflects a consistent and professional presentation aligned with the organization's mission and affiliation with the Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft (DDG). Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with responsive design for mobile devices, but lacks advanced CMS or modern frameworks. Security posture is moderate with no explicit security headers detected and no cookie consent mechanism, though HTTPS is assumed. The site does not appear to collect sensitive data beyond search forms and does not use tracking or advertising scripts. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the organization's history.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diabetes-psychologie.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention diabetes-psychologie.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for diabetes-psychologie.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a strong position within the German healthcare non-profit sector focused on diabetes psychosocial care. It leverages partnerships with recognized bodies like the DDG and offers specialized certifications and training, which enhance its credibility and market niche. The business model is service and education-oriented, targeting healthcare professionals and patients. The website content and event announcements indicate active engagement and growth potential. The lack of commercial advertising and tracking suggests a focus on trust and community service rather than revenue generation. The organization’s digital presence is stable but could benefit from enhanced technical modernization and privacy compliance features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is presumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. Forms are limited to search functionality with POST method, reducing risk exposure. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating potential gaps in security transparency. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and explicit privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and certificate transparency.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Consider modernizing the technical stack and CMS for better maintainability, performance, and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Diabetes & Psychologie e.V.
Description
Non-profit association focused on psychosocial and psychological aspects of diabetes, providing education, events, certifications, and resources for patients and professionals.
Key services
Educational webinars and annual conferences, Certification modules for diabetes psychological care, Psychotherapeutic specialist training, Resource and literature provision, Psychotherapeutic search tool
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS media queries for responsive design, JavaScript for menu and form interactions
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed due to domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional non-profit association site focused on diabetes and psychology.
  2. Content is comprehensive with detailed event information, publications, and resources.
  3. No signs of malicious content or phishing.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie banners detected, but privacy policy page exists.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations in provided data.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  7. Forms are minimal and only for search functionality, no sensitive data collection visible.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom-built HTML and CSS structure with JavaScript for interactive menus and search form behavior. Responsive design is achieved through multiple CSS media queries targeting various device widths and orientations, including smartphones and tablets. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a traditional static or server-rendered site. External dependencies are minimal, limited to Zoom links for webinars and external resource links. Performance is likely moderate given the simple tech stack but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is basic with meta charset and viewport tags but lacks Open Graph or structured data markup. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diabetes-psychologie.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diabetes-psychologie.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.