Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention dgav.info, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dgav.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie e.V. · Healthcare · Germany
High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie e.V. (DGAV) is a prominent German medical society dedicated to advancing general and visceral surgery through education, certification, research, and professional collaboration. The organization serves surgeons, medical professionals, students, and patients by providing comprehensive training programs, organizing congresses, developing clinical guidelines, and certifying surgical centers. DGAV holds a leading position in the German healthcare sector for surgical specialties, emphasizing scientific rigor and quality assurance. Technically, the DGAV website is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with a WordPress backend for content management. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, hosted on professional infrastructure with secure HTTPS and appropriate security headers. The digital maturity of the platform reflects a strong commitment to user experience and technical best practices. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear GDPR-aligned privacy and cookie policies and minimal user tracking. Overall, the DGAV website presents a low-risk profile with high professionalism and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include publishing formal security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing transparency around data protection officer contacts to further strengthen compliance and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention dgav.info, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dgav.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with dgav.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dgav.info.