Skip to main content

Security report for deye.cz

BENEKOV ENERGY SYSTEM · Energy · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BENEKOV ENERGY SYSTEM operates a specialized energy monitoring platform branded as BENEKOV ENERGY MONITOR, focusing on photovoltaic energy systems. The website serves primarily as a login portal for users to access monitoring data, indicating a B2B or B2C service model centered on energy management. The company appears to be a small-sized entity based in the Czech Republic, founded around 2021, with a niche market position in energy monitoring services. Technically, the website employs standard JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, SweetAlert2, and ECharts for UI and data visualization. Hosting is managed via Czech providers, with domain registration consistent with the business timeline. However, the site lacks modern security headers, explicit HTTPS confirmation, and comprehensive SEO or accessibility features, indicating room for technical maturity improvements. From a security perspective, the site includes a basic login form but lacks advanced protections such as CSRF tokens, security headers, and visible HTTPS enforcement. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and contact information is limited to a single email address. These factors suggest a low to moderate security posture with significant opportunities for enhancement to meet compliance and best practice standards. Overall, the website is functional but minimalistic, with moderate trustworthiness based on domain legitimacy and business consistency. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and content richness are recommended to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deye.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BENEKOV ENERGY SYSTEM targets the energy sector with a focus on photovoltaic energy monitoring. Its business model likely revolves around providing monitoring services to energy system operators or customers, possibly via subscription or service contracts. The company is relatively new, founded in 2021, and operates in the Czech Republic. Competitive advantages may include localized expertise and specialized monitoring technology. The lack of extensive marketing or partner information suggests a focused, possibly direct-sales approach. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal public content. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced digital presence and compliance documentation to support market expansion and customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website uses password fields and some client-side scripting for login but lacks critical security controls such as HTTPS enforcement, security headers, CSRF protection, and multi-factor authentication. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no visible data encryption or secure session management details. The security culture is not evident from the site. Business impact of these gaps includes potential exposure to credential theft, data breaches, and regulatory non-compliance. Immediate remediation is advised to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enhance login form security with CSRF tokens, disable password autocomplete, and consider multi-factor authentication.
  5. Develop an incident response plan and publish contact channels for security issues to improve trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BENEKOV ENERGY SYSTEM
Description
The website appears to be an energy monitoring system branded as BENEKOV ENERGY MONITOR, likely related to photovoltaic energy (FVE). It provides a login portal for users to access monitoring data.
Key services
Energy monitoring, User login access to monitoring data
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, SweetAlert2, ECharts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Login form uses password input with toggle visibility

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for an energy monitoring system.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact email is provided in page text but no phone or physical address found.
  4. No social media or external marketing links present.
  5. Technical implementation uses common JS libraries but lacks modern security headers and HTTPS confirmation.
  6. Content is minimal and functional but lacks comprehensive business or legal information.
  7. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy but domain is relatively young.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic tech stack including jQuery for DOM manipulation, SweetAlert2 for alerts, and ECharts for data visualization. Hosting is via Czech providers with domain registration consistent with the business. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or mobile responsiveness features detected. The site lacks a CMS or modern frameworks, indicating potential technical debt and limited scalability. SEO and accessibility are minimal, reducing discoverability and user inclusiveness. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design, improving SEO metadata, and integrating security best practices. Technical risks include potential vulnerabilities from outdated libraries and lack of secure coding practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deye.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deye.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.