Skip to main content

Security report for detailproduktion.se

Detail Produktionsbyrå · Media · Sweden

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Detail Produktionsbyrå is a creative production agency based in Stockholm, Sweden, founded in 2014. The company offers a broad range of services including graphic design, digital and motion media, copywriting, photography, and accessibility adaptations. Their website demonstrates a strong market position with a comprehensive portfolio and a client base that includes notable organizations. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile-friendly, and accessible. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is robust with clear cookie consent and a detailed privacy policy. Overall, the website projects professionalism and trustworthiness, supporting the company's credibility in the creative media sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching detailproduktion.se

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and organizations requiring creative production services, positioning itself as a reliable and creative partner. Their business model revolves around providing tailored creative solutions across print and digital media. The portfolio and client logos indicate a stable client base and ongoing projects, suggesting steady revenue streams. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies indicates an independent small business. The use of GDPR-compliant tools and detailed privacy information reflects awareness of regulatory requirements. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like Google and uses WordPress plugins to enhance functionality and compliance. Strategic observations include a focus on customer satisfaction, as evidenced by testimonials and a high recommendation rate from clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. The use of WP Sentry integration indicates active error monitoring. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable GDPR plugin, ensuring compliance with privacy laws. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security by integrating CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures to prevent spam and abuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Detail Produktionsbyrå
Description
En kreativ produktionsbyrå som gärna hjälper dig med både effektiv originalproduktion och effektiva lösningar.
Key services
Kommunikation, Digitalt & rörligt, Produktion, Foto & illustration, Design & form, Copy, Tillgänglighet
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Font Awesome, Bootstrap 3.1.1, jQuery 1.10.2, WordPress 6.7.2, Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR plugin, Contact Form 7, WP Sentry Integration
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of WP Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy
  3. Comprehensive portfolio and client references enhance trust
  4. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  6. Contact information is clearly presented and includes multiple channels
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 using Bootstrap 3.1.1 and jQuery 1.10.2, which are somewhat dated but still functional. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and Google Maps API for location services. The Complianz GDPR plugin manages cookie consent effectively. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and Google services. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization given the use of older libraries. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, supported by responsive design and accessibility adaptations. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include reliance on older JavaScript libraries and lack of some modern security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with detailproduktion.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review detailproduktion.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.