Skip to main content

Security report for destination-racing.eu

Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website destination-racing.eu serves as the official digital platform for the Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace's stadium renovation project, providing detailed information about the extension and modernization of Stade de la Meinau. It targets supporters and local community members, offering updates on construction phases, new services, and ticketing access. The site leverages a modern WordPress infrastructure with Elementor and Jet plugins, ensuring a visually appealing and responsive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, though improvements are recommended in security headers and privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but the website's branding, social media presence, and content quality strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned to engage its audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching destination-racing.eu

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace occupies a significant position in French football with a loyal fan base. This website supports the club's strategic communication around the stadium's renovation, enhancing fan engagement and promoting hospitality services. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, hospitality events, and merchandising. The partnership ecosystem includes official club sites and ticketing platforms, reinforcing credibility. The business model focuses on community engagement and service promotion rather than direct e-commerce. Growth indicators include active content updates and multimedia integration. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining transparent communication during construction phases to sustain fan loyalty.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for enhancement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information is present, which could be improved to align with best practices and compliance requirements like GDPR and NIS2. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager, necessitating regular audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency to strengthen trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to foster transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and meet WCAG standards.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Racing Club de Strasbourg Alsace
Description
Destination Racing : plongez au cœur du stade de demain ! Supporters, suivez l’évolution des travaux et des nouveautés.
Key services
Information on stadium renovation phases, Updates on services and facilities, Access to ticketing and customer service, Event and hospitality services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, JetMenu, JetEngine, WP Rocket, jQuery, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration insights
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  4. Contact information includes a clearly labeled phone number and contact page
  5. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with Elementor and Jet plugins
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is present
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  9. Social media presence is strong and consistent with official club
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Jet plugins, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It employs WP Rocket for performance optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including structured data and meta tags. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to improve loading speed and accessibility. The absence of detected hosting provider information suggests potential use of managed WordPress hosting or CDN services. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers, which should be addressed to ensure operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with destination-racing.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review destination-racing.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.