Skip to main content

Security report for designedtolivelatvia.com

Designed to Live · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Designed to Live is a small non-profit organization based in Latvia focused on empowering individuals influenced by disability through prosthetic care and ministry programs. Their mission emphasizes physical, emotional, and spiritual support with a Christian foundation. The website is professionally designed using the Squarespace platform, featuring clear navigation, social media integration, and contact information including email, phone, and physical address with map links. Technical infrastructure is modern but basic, relying on Squarespace hosting and Google services. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and contact details appear consistent and trustworthy. Overall, the site presents a credible and focused non-profit presence with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching designedtolivelatvia.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, targeting individuals affected by disability in Latvia and Ukraine. Their business model centers on providing prosthetic devices and spiritual ministry, positioning them as a niche service provider with a compassionate mission. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants, supported by a 'Give Now' call to action. The website's social media presence and clear contact details support community engagement and transparency. The lack of WHOIS data suggests a recent domain registration or privacy protection, which should be monitored for legitimacy. The organization demonstrates a commitment to GDPR compliance through privacy and cookie policies but lacks formal terms of service and security policies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating basic security and privacy awareness. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond Squarespace defaults were detected, reducing privacy risks. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, as it impedes verification of domain ownership and history. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, security policies, and domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and enable HSTS with preload and includeSubDomains.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide vulnerability disclosure information and improve security transparency.
  3. Ensure domain registration information is complete and publicly available to enhance trustworthiness.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
“Designed to Live” Biedrība
VAT number
LV40203397315
Registration number
40008292310
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Designed to Live
Description
Serving those influenced by disability by empowering them physically, emotionally, and spiritually with the intentional demonstration of the love of Jesus Christ
Key services
Prosthetic Care, Ministry Programs, Mission: Ukraine support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, JavaScript, CSS3
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with standard templates and Google Fonts.
  2. Content is focused on non-profit prosthetic care and ministry services in Latvia.
  3. Contact information is detailed and includes email, phone with WhatsApp/Signal/Telegram, and physical address with map links.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn is active and linked.
  5. Cookie consent banner and privacy policy are implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  7. No forms detected that collect user data on the homepage.
  8. No advanced security headers detected; SSL is enabled but HSTS is not.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard Squarespace scripts.
  10. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust but website content is consistent with a legitimate non-profit.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace CMS platform, leveraging Google Fonts and Google Maps APIs for enhanced user experience. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with responsive design for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, typical for Squarespace-hosted sites. Accessibility features are basic, with some semantic HTML and skip links present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies were detected. The site lacks advanced security configurations and analytics integrations, indicating a focus on simplicity and privacy. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements are recommended to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with designedtolivelatvia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review designedtolivelatvia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.