Skip to main content

Security report for dermaclinic.lv

Veselības centrs 4 · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.dermaclinic.lv represents a dermatology clinic branch of "Veselības centrs 4", positioned as the largest and most modern dermatology clinic in Latvia. It targets patients seeking professional skin care and dermatological services. The site is professionally designed with good content relevance and clear navigation, optimized for mobile devices. Technically, it employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and Google Maps API for location services. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages were not found in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and detailed security policies. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy for general audiences seeking dermatology services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dermaclinic.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically dermatology, under the parent company "Veselības centrs 4". It holds a strong market position in Latvia as a leading dermatology clinic. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on patient care and treatment. The website integrates advertising and tracking tools from major providers like Google and Meta, indicating a marketing strategy to reach and engage potential patients. The absence of direct contact details on the site may suggest contact is handled offline or on other pages not included in the data. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand presence and uses trusted third-party services for analytics and cookie management.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The lack of visible privacy policy and incident response contacts reduces compliance maturity. The extensive use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, explicit privacy policies, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Include clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a WHOIS privacy service with justification to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Veselības centrs 4
Description
"Veselības centrs 4" filiāle "Dermatoloģijas klīnika" ir lielākā un modernākā šāda veida klīnika Latvijā. Uzticiet ādas problēmas profesionāļiem!
Key services
Dermatology consultations, Skin problem treatments, Professional dermatological care
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google Maps API, Roboto font, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Use of multiple Google services for analytics and maps integration.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to dermatology healthcare services.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and Google Maps API integration. The HTML and CSS are well-structured with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more detailed metadata for improved search engine visibility and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dermaclinic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dermaclinic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.