Skip to main content

Security report for deponata.de

deponata GmbH & Co. KG · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

deponata GmbH & Co. KG is a German company specializing in environmental services, particularly the disposal and processing of mineral construction and production waste, soil material brokerage, and electronic waste tracking. The company is qualified for public procurement and actively engages in environmental sponsorships, positioning itself as a reliable and certified disposal specialist within the energy and environmental sector. The website content is professional, well-structured, and targeted primarily at public sector clients and environmental stakeholders. Technically, the website employs a moderate technology stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics with IP anonymization, hosted likely by Prointernet. The site is served over HTTPS with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Consent management is implemented via a third-party platform, supporting GDPR compliance. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and privacy-conscious analytics but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is noted as an area for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations, with a moderate security posture. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving mobile optimization to further strengthen the digital maturity and trustworthiness of the company’s online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deponata.de

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

deponata GmbH & Co. KG operates in the environmental services sector with a focus on waste disposal and soil processing, serving public sector clients and construction-related industries. The company holds certifications such as Präqualifikation HPQR and is a certified disposal specialist, which enhances its competitive positioning. Its business model revolves around providing specialized environmental services including electronic waste tracking and soil material brokerage. The company demonstrates commitment to sustainability through sponsorship of local environmental awards, indicating strong community engagement. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality, supporting its market credibility. The partnership with Prointernet for hosting and digital services suggests a stable technology ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by public procurement qualifications and environmental certifications.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reflecting privacy-conscious practices. The presence of a consent management platform indicates compliance with GDPR cookie consent requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content or scripts. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is a gap in transparency and security culture. Overall, the site is secure for typical business operations but could benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to facilitate vulnerability reporting and demonstrate security maturity.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to enhance transparency and encourage responsible disclosure.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices and for users with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
deponata GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Fachkundiges, leistungsfähiges und zuverlässiges Unternehmen für öffentliche Aufträge, eingetragen im Hessischen Präqualifizierungsregister, engagiert im Umwelt- und Ressourcenschutz, Sponsor für lokale Nachhaltigkeitsprojekte.
Key services
Entsorgung von mineralischen Bau- und Produktionsabfällen, Vermittlung von Bodenmaterial für Erdbauwerke, Elektronisches Abfallnachweisverfahren (eANV), Aufbereitung von Boden
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Google Fonts, Fancybox, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Consent management for cookies and tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Consent Management Platform by Prointernet
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at public sector and environmental clients.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact likely via contact page form.
  4. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  5. Consent management is implemented with a third-party consent platform.
  6. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization for privacy compliance.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and modern fonts and scripts.
  10. Footer contains links to contact, privacy, imprint, and login pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a moderate technology stack primarily based on jQuery and jQuery UI, with styling via LESS and multiple Google Fonts for typography. It employs Fancybox for media display and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking with privacy considerations. The CMS appears to be a proprietary or specialized system provided by Prointernet, which also hosts the site and related assets. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The site uses canonical URLs and meta tags effectively for SEO. No modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced backend technologies are evident from the HTML content. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deponata.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deponata.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.