Skip to main content

Security report for denieuweschepenvandoeksen.nl

Plinko slot · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.denieuweschepenvandoeksen.nl is a Dutch-language content platform focused on the Plinko online casino game. It provides comprehensive guides, reviews, and casino recommendations targeted at Dutch-speaking online gamblers interested in Plinko. The site positions itself as a niche media provider with a small-scale business model centered on affiliate marketing and content monetization. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript ES modules, and integrates Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and structured data implementation. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CSRF tokens, and implements a cookie consent banner, but lacks explicit published security policies or incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR-related cookie and privacy policies, though it could improve transparency on security and incident response. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, which is justified given the gambling-related content. The site is safe for adults and does not contain explicit or NSFW content beyond gambling-related material.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching denieuweschepenvandoeksen.nl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on online gambling content specifically for the Plinko slot game in the Netherlands. It targets adult Dutch-speaking casino players by providing detailed game guides, reviews, and bonus offers. The business model appears to be content-driven affiliate marketing, leveraging SEO and structured data to attract organic traffic. The site maintains a consistent brand and trust signals such as DMCA protection and expert authorship. The absence of phone contact and limited social media presence suggests a lean operation. The company is small-sized with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The site’s market position is niche but well-defined, catering to a specific gambling game audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The domain’s WHOIS privacy protection is appropriate for the gambling niche. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user data handling practices.
  5. Expand social media presence and contact options to improve business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Plinko slot
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plinko slot
Description
Plinko slot website providing reviews, guides, and information about the Plinko game, an online casino slot game. The site offers detailed guides, tips, and casino recommendations for playing Plinko in the Netherlands.
Key services
Plinko game reviews, Casino recommendations, Gameplay guides, Bonus offers information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript ES Modules, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on Plinko online casino game with detailed guides and reviews.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent banner.
  4. No contact phone numbers found; only email contact provided.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Good use of structured data for SEO and FAQ.
  7. Social media presence limited to Telegram link only.
  8. No CMS or hosting provider explicitly identified.
  9. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the main page.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with ES module JavaScript, CSS3, and HTML5. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement including FAQ and organization schema. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the HTML. Performance is moderate with preloading of CSS and JS assets. Accessibility is basic but present. There is room for improvement in security headers and explicit technical documentation. Overall, the technical implementation supports a good user experience and SEO performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with denieuweschepenvandoeksen.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review denieuweschepenvandoeksen.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.