Skip to main content

Security report for dekubity.eu

Dekubity · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dekubity.eu is a Czech healthcare informational portal dedicated to the topic of pressure ulcers (dekubity). It serves both the general public and healthcare professionals by providing educational content, clinical recommendations, and resources related to prevention, care, and treatment of pressure ulcers. The site is supported by multiple healthcare partners and sponsors, indicating a trusted position within its niche. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and SEO plugins, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, though some security headers and explicit privacy policies are missing. The absence of public WHOIS data due to privacy protection is noted but justified given the nature of the site. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned as a specialized healthcare resource.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dekubity.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dekubity.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dekubity.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal targets a niche healthcare segment focused on pressure ulcers, addressing both laypersons and medical professionals. Its business model is informational and educational, supported by partnerships with healthcare companies and organizations. The presence of clinical guidelines, event announcements, and patient organization partnerships suggests a well-integrated ecosystem. The site’s content quality and partner network indicate a stable market position within Czech healthcare education. Growth potential lies in expanding educational resources and strengthening compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking explicit cookie consent and privacy policies. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls, formalized incident response, and improved privacy transparency to meet GDPR and NIS2 standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information publicly.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security and privacy compliance reviews.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dekubity
Description
Portál věnovaný problematice proleženin/dekubitů. Cílem je zvýšit informovanost veřejnosti o problematice dekubitů, prevencí, péči o kůži, výživy, léčby včetně výběru vhodných krycích materiálů.
Key services
Information for public, Information for healthcare professionals, Educational materials, Clinical recommendations, Event announcements, Partner and sponsor collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Koko Analytics, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WP Rocket and Elementor)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Koko Analytics, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Koko Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare informational portal focused on pressure ulcers (dekubity).
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting both public and healthcare professionals.
  3. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating privacy protection.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected explicitly.
  5. Contact information includes a company email and phone number clearly labeled.
  6. Multiple partner and sponsor logos and links are present.
  7. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and SEO plugins.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature and maintainable technical stack. Performance is moderate with WP Rocket caching and lazy loading implemented. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site integrates analytics tools including Koko Analytics and Google Analytics. No hosting provider details were found. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but can be enhanced for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dekubity.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dekubity.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.