Skip to main content

Security report for dekra.se

DEKRA · Energy · Sweden

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEKRA is a large, well-established company founded in 1925, specializing in safety-related services including inspection, testing, certification, and consulting across multiple sectors such as energy, transportation, and manufacturing. The company holds a strong market position as a global leader in safety expertise with a comprehensive service portfolio and a consistent brand presence. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted on Microsoft Azure, and employs a variety of analytics and marketing tools while maintaining good security practices including HSTS and strong content security policies. The security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, though improvements in TLS protocol support and security headers are recommended. Overall, DEKRA demonstrates a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, user experience, and compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dekra.se

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEKRA operates in multiple sectors with a focus on safety and sustainability, offering a wide range of services from vehicle inspection to industrial testing and sustainability advisory. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting both corporate clients and individual consumers. The company leverages a global network and holds multiple accreditations, enhancing its competitive advantage. DEKRA's strategic approach includes integrating sustainability frameworks like CSRD and ESG into their offerings, positioning them as a forward-thinking leader in their industry. Their extensive content and clear navigation support customer engagement and trust, while their partnerships and subsidiaries expand their market reach.

Security posture

The website employs strong security headers including HSTS with subdomain inclusion, X-Frame-Options set to SAMEORIGIN, and a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy that restricts resource loading to trusted domains. SSL certificates are valid and issued by a reputable CA, though the absence of TLS 1.2 or higher is a notable gap. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are present. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and analytics tools, which are managed via strict CSP directives. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not explicitly found, indicating potential areas for improvement in transparency and security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade SSL/TLS configuration to support TLS 1.2 or higher for enhanced security.
  2. Enable HSTS preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement across browsers.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  4. Add X-XSS-Protection header with appropriate settings to mitigate XSS risks.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js and Vue.js frameworks, styled with Tailwind CSS, and hosted on Microsoft Azure. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Matomo, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Application Insights. The CMS used is FirstSpirit by e-Spirit. The site demonstrates fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility. SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and alternate language links. The technical infrastructure is modern and robust, supporting a comprehensive and content-rich user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dekra.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dekra.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.