Skip to main content

Security report for dekra-neo.com

DEKRA Neo GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEKRA Neo GmbH is a German media agency specializing in digital learning solutions including live online trainings, e-learning, and explanatory films, with a focus on safety, security, and sustainability sectors. The company operates as a medium-sized entity with a full-service model, leveraging inhouse production and IT capabilities to deliver tailored learning media. Their market position is strengthened by notable clients and a rebranding under the DEKRA group umbrella since 2024. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, optimized for performance and mobile use, though it lacks some advanced security configurations like modern TLS protocols and DNSSEC. The security posture is solid with ISO 27001 certification and GDPR compliance, but improvements in SSL/TLS configuration and DNS security are recommended. Overall, the company demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and digital maturity, with clear business and technical strategies aligned to their market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dekra-neo.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEKRA Neo GmbH holds a strong position in the digital learning media market, targeting corporate clients in safety, security, and sustainability. Their competitive advantage lies in full-service inhouse production, combining media expertise with IT solutions. Revenue streams likely include custom e-learning development, platform hosting, and training services. The company serves large clients such as Lufthansa Group, indicating scalability and trust. Their partnership ecosystem includes related DEKRA platforms enhancing their service portfolio. Growth indicators include recent rebranding and expansion of digital offerings. Strategic observations suggest a focus on compliance, quality, and client-centric solutions to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The security maturity of DEKRA Neo GmbH is moderate to good, with ISO 27001 certification evidencing formalized information security management. The website uses a valid SSL certificate but lacks support for modern TLS versions, which is a security gap. DNSSEC and CAA records are not implemented, reducing DNS security. The presence of GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies indicates regulatory adherence. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could be improved. Data protection practices appear sound, with consent mechanisms and secure contact forms. Overall, the security culture is positive but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols to improve SSL security and compatibility.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain name system security and certificate issuance control.
  3. Publish an explicit vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident handling.
  4. Establish and publicize incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy consent mechanisms to maintain compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DEKRA Neo GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is modern, leveraging Nuxt.js for server-side rendering and Tailwind CSS for styling, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile optimization. The use of ES modules and preloading scripts indicates good performance practices. However, the absence of TLS 1.2+ protocols and DNSSEC suggests technical debt in security configuration. Hosting details are not explicit, but the IP address and Apache server indicate a traditional hosting environment. No third-party analytics or tracking services were detected, which aligns with minimal user tracking. Opportunities exist to modernize security protocols and enhance DNS security to reduce risk and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dekra-neo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dekra-neo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.