Skip to main content

Security report for dekra-expert-migration.com

DEKRA Expert Migration GmbH · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEKRA Expert Migration GmbH specializes in the recruitment, qualification, and integration of international skilled workers primarily in healthcare, social services, transport logistics, IT, and industrial sectors. With over ten years of experience and a strong partnership with DEKRA Akademie GmbH, the company offers a comprehensive end-to-end service including assessment, training, administrative support, and integration management. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality and user experience, targeting German companies seeking international talent. Technically, the site is built on Nuxt.js with modern frontend technologies and is hosted on an Apache server with a valid SSL certificate, though TLS protocols are not optimally configured. Security practices include CSRF protection via cookies but lack some modern headers and DNS security features. Overall, the company demonstrates a strong market position with trust indicators such as EcoVadis Platinum certification and GDPR compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dekra-expert-migration.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEKRA Expert Migration operates as an essential entity within the healthcare and related sectors, leveraging a modular business model that allows clients to customize recruitment and qualification pathways. The company maintains a broad international network spanning six countries with ongoing expansion. Its competitive advantage lies in offering integrated services from recruitment to qualification and legal recognition, supported by a reputable parent company, DEKRA SE. The target market includes medium-sized to large German enterprises facing skilled labor shortages. The company emphasizes ethical recruitment, compliance with international standards, and sustainable integration, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the international labor market.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with valid SSL but lacking modern TLS protocol support and HSTS enforcement. The presence of HttpOnly and SameSite=Strict cookies for CSRF protection is positive. However, the absence of DNSSEC, CAA records, and security.txt reduces the overall security maturity. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are present. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is evident through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers and DNS security to improve resilience against attacks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to ensure secure communications.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to protect DNS integrity and certificate issuance.
  5. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Nuxt.js framework with Vue.js and Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. The server runs Apache with chunked transfer encoding. The SSL certificate is valid but uses an unknown algorithm and lacks support for modern TLS versions, which is a technical risk. DNS records are standard but lack DNSSEC and CAA. Performance metrics are not reported but inferred fast due to modern tech stack and optimized images. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were detected, suggesting minimal tracking and good privacy posture. The technical infrastructure is solid but requires updates in security protocols and DNS configurations to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dekra-expert-migration.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dekra-expert-migration.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.