Skip to main content

Security report for deckengineering.ee

DECK Engineering OÜ · Energy · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DECK Engineering OÜ is a specialized engineering and EPC company based in Estonia, founded in 2013. The company focuses on mechanical engineering, structural calculations, and turnkey EPC solutions primarily for the Oil & Gas, Offshore, Marine, and Machine-building industries. Their website presents a professional image with detailed service descriptions, project references, and partner logos from recognized classification societies, indicating a credible market position within their niche. The target audience includes industrial clients requiring engineering design and manufacturing services in energy and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website employs a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, and a proprietary Imperial CMS framework. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and moderate performance. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting a privacy-conscious or minimal tracking approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies represents a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are also missing, which could impact trust and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the website is professional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security headers, and clearer contact information. These improvements would strengthen trust and align the site with best practices in security and privacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deckengineering.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DECK Engineering OÜ operates as a small-sized essential entity in the energy and manufacturing sectors, providing engineering and EPC services. Their business model revolves around delivering specialized mechanical engineering, structural calculations, and turnkey EPC projects to industrial clients in Oil & Gas, Offshore, Marine, and Machine-building industries. The company leverages partnerships with recognized classification societies to enhance credibility. The website content and domain age support a mature business presence since 2013. The absence of visible contact emails and phone numbers on the homepage may limit direct client engagement but the presence of a contact page suggests available communication channels. The company appears focused on quality and innovation, with a consistent brand presentation and a clear value proposition targeting industrial clients requiring complex engineering solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No forms were detected on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface, but the contact form on a separate page should be reviewed for secure implementation. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies including dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet recognized standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by including verified company emails and phone numbers on the website to improve trust and communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DECK Engineering OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DECK Engineering OÜ
Description
Engineering and EPC company with extensive experience in design and manufacturing of equipment for Oil & Gas, Offshore, Marine, and Machine-building industries.
Key services
Mechanical engineering, Structural calculations, Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Fancybox, Imperial JS framework
Frameworks
Imperial
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by baseUrl https://deckengineering.ee)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage or footer.
  3. Contact page link present but content not provided for analysis.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. Website uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks.
  6. Good presentation of business services and projects.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No social media links found in the provided HTML.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage; contact form likely on separate contact page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery, and Fancybox, integrated within a proprietary Imperial CMS framework. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and Google Fonts, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and a mobile navigation menu. SEO optimization is basic, with meta keywords present but no advanced structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO practices, accessibility improvements, and security header configurations to reduce technical risks and improve overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deckengineering.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deckengineering.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.