Skip to main content

Security report for debra-cz.org

DEBRA ČR · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEBRA ČR is a well-established Czech non-profit organization dedicated to supporting patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa, a rare and severe skin condition. The organization provides expert advice, awareness campaigns, patient and family support, and collaborates with clinical centers and international bodies. Their market position is strong within the Czech Republic's healthcare non-profit sector, supported by transparent operations and recognized certifications. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy image with comprehensive content and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and employs modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, all integrated with user consent mechanisms. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, hosted likely by Ignum.cz. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, security headers are not explicitly detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing minor gaps. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Business credibility is high, supported by clear contact information, certifications, and partner affiliations. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong trust indicators and good digital maturity. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and DNSSEC implementation would further enhance security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching debra-cz.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
90
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEBRA ČR operates in the healthcare non-profit sector, focusing on a rare disease patient community. Their business model relies on donations, fundraising through an e-shop, and awareness projects like NADOTEK. The organization targets patients, families, healthcare professionals, and the general public in the Czech Republic. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized expertise, international affiliations, and transparent operations. Partnerships with recognized institutions and certifications bolster their reputation. Growth indicators include active event calendars, media campaigns, and expanding digital presence. The organization maintains a clear and consistent brand identity, leveraging patronage and storytelling to engage supporters.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no evident exposure of sensitive data. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, and third-party analytics are used responsibly. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and DNSSEC reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. The use of popular third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DEBRA ČR, z.ú.
Registration number
26666952
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DEBRA ČR
Description
DEBRA ČR je pacientská organizace, která pomáhá lidem s nemocí motýlích křídel (Epidermolysis Bullosa, EB). Poskytuje odborné poradenství, šíří informace o nemoci a léčbě, propojuje pacienty a rodiny, spolupracuje s klinickým EB Centrem a zapojuje se do výzkumu.
Key services
poradenství pacientům, osvěta a vzdělávání, podpora rodin, organizace akcí a kampaní, prodej charitativních produktů
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Breeze Prefetch, All in One SEO Pro
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed non-profit healthcare organization site.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No visible security issues or WAF blocking detected.
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with user consent.
  6. WHOIS data aligns well with website claims, supporting legitimacy.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit incident response or security contact information found.
  9. Multiple partner and certification logos enhance trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a custom theme and uses a variety of third-party analytics and marketing tools. The presence of Breeze Prefetch indicates performance optimization efforts. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Hosting appears stable, though no explicit hosting provider is declared. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through further optimization. The technical stack is standard for non-profit organizations, balancing functionality and ease of maintenance. No critical technical debt or risks were identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with debra-cz.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review debra-cz.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.