Skip to main content

Security report for debra-austria.org

DEBRA Austria · Healthcare · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEBRA Austria is a specialized non-profit patient organization dedicated to supporting individuals affected by Epidermolysis bullosa (EB), also known as Schmetterlingskinder. The organization facilitates medical care through the EB-Haus Austria specialized clinic, funds research for therapy development, and provides direct aid to patients and families. Their market position is strong within Austria as a leading EB support entity, with a clear focus on healthcare and patient advocacy. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, targeting patients, caregivers, and donors. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS and uses modern JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience, though performance data is limited. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability. Privacy compliance is moderate, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism despite tracking technologies. Overall, the site is trustworthy but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance credibility.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching debra-austria.org

This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
Average
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention debra-austria.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for debra-austria.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEBRA Austria operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on rare disease patient support. Their business model relies on donations, fundraising campaigns, and partnerships with specialized clinics and research networks. The organization targets patients with EB, their families, and philanthropic supporters. Their partnerships with EB-Haus Austria and international EB research networks strengthen their ecosystem and credibility. The website content is rich and professionally presented, indicating a mature organization with a clear mission. Growth indicators include active event listings, news updates, and calls for donations. The presence of trust seals and transparent contact information further supports their legitimacy and donor confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with several HTTP security headers implemented, such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical security gap, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No advanced security policies or incident response information is provided. The SPF record for email is correctly configured, reducing email spoofing risks. The absence of HSTS and OCSP stapling further weakens the SSL/TLS security posture. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism despite the use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is poor and requires immediate remediation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure data in transit.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system. It uses Apache as the web server and is hosted on infrastructure associated with digimagical.com. The front-end employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and Photoswipe for image galleries, enhancing user interaction. Meta tags and Open Graph data are well implemented, supporting SEO and social media sharing. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good navigation clarity and professional design. However, performance metrics are missing, and the lack of HTTPS negatively impacts technical credibility. The DNS and SPF records are properly configured, indicating good email infrastructure management. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires security upgrades and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with debra-austria.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review debra-austria.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.