Skip to main content

Security report for dealogic.com

Dealogic · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dealogic is a leading provider of software and data solutions for the global capital markets, serving top financial firms worldwide. As part of ION Analytics, Dealogic offers platforms tailored for investment banking, capital markets, syndicate, sales, trading, research, investment managers, and corporations. Their business model focuses on delivering industry-standard data and connectivity solutions that enhance deal-making, compliance, and market insights. The company maintains a strong market position as a trusted partner with extensive media presence and client base. Technically, the website is built on WordPress hosted on Microsoft Azure, leveraging modern web technologies including TLS 1.3, OCSP stapling, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and 6sense. The site supports multiple languages and demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization, although accessibility is basic. From a security perspective, Dealogic implements strong email authentication with SPF and DMARC policies, uses secure TLS protocols, and has OCSP stapling enabled. However, it lacks HSTS enforcement, DNSSEC, and certificate transparency compliance. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and cookie consent mechanisms are not evident. The security posture is good but could be improved with additional best practices. Overall, Dealogic's website reflects a mature enterprise with strong branding, comprehensive business offerings, and a solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security transparency and privacy compliance would enhance trust and reduce risk exposure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dealogic.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dealogic.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
122
Employees
2
Customers
115
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
16%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for dealogic.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –login.dealogic.com2025-07-20
  • –ia.dealogic.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dealogic operates in the finance sector, providing essential software and data services to investment banks, capital markets participants, and corporations globally. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive platform offerings and integration within the ION Group ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based access to data platforms, analytics, and deal connectivity services. The target customers are large financial institutions requiring reliable market data and compliance tools. The company shows growth indicators through frequent market reports and media citations. Partnerships with ION Group and related analytics brands strengthen its market presence. Operationally, Dealogic emphasizes trusted relationships and data quality, positioning itself as a critical infrastructure provider in capital markets.

Security posture

Dealogic demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced DMARC reject policies, valid SPF records, and support for modern TLS protocols including TLS 1.3. OCSP stapling is enabled and functioning, reducing certificate validation latency. However, the absence of HSTS and DNSSEC reduces protection against certain attack vectors such as protocol downgrade and DNS spoofing. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and readiness communication. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Data protection practices appear aligned with GDPR through privacy and cookie policies, but cookie consent mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing or cache poisoning.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information including contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  5. Achieve certificate transparency compliance to improve SSL certificate trust and monitoring.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme, hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. It uses modern web technologies including TLS 1.3, OCSP stapling, and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Three.js for interactive content. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and 6sense, indicating extensive user tracking and marketing integration. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5.5 seconds and a page size of about 780 KB. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and language localization. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC, missing HSTS, and absence of certificate transparency compliance, which could impact security and trust. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from modernization in security controls and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dealogic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dealogic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.