Skip to main content

Security report for deac.lv

Delska · Energy · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Delska operates as a sustainable data center provider in Northern Europe, particularly focusing on the Baltic region. The company emphasizes green energy usage, GDPR compliance, and robust security, positioning itself as a leading medium-sized player with over 25 years of experience. Their business model centers on providing environmentally friendly data center services to enterprises requiring secure and compliant hosting solutions. The website content is professionally presented with consistent branding and clear messaging targeting enterprise customers interested in sustainable IT infrastructure. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Material Design Icons, and Google Fonts, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Reddit Pixel, and Hotjar, managed through Google Tag Manager. Cookie consent is managed comprehensively via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses domain transfer locks, and implements CSRF protection cookies. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and explicit security policies or incident response contacts are not published. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain is newly registered but consistent with the business's claims, suggesting a recent domain acquisition or rebranding. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front with good privacy compliance and security posture. Strategic improvements include enabling DNSSEC, publishing detailed security and incident response policies, adding terms of service, and enhancing accessibility. These steps would further strengthen the company's digital maturity and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deac.lv

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention deac.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
84
Employees
0
Customers
84
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for deac.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Delska is positioned as a key player in the sustainable data center market in Northern Europe, leveraging over two decades of experience. Their competitive advantage lies in their commitment to 100% green energy and GDPR compliance, appealing to environmentally conscious enterprises and organizations with strict data protection requirements. The business model focuses on providing data center infrastructure and hosting services with a sustainability angle. Revenue streams likely include colocation, managed hosting, and cloud services. The company targets medium to large enterprises in the Baltic region and Northern Europe. The partnership ecosystem includes major analytics and marketing platforms but no direct partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include modern web presence and integration of advanced consent management tools.

Security posture

The security maturity of Delska's website is good, with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer locks in place. The use of Cookiebot for consent management demonstrates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. The site uses multiple third-party tracking pixels, which increases the attack surface but is common in marketing-driven sites. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could be a compliance gap under frameworks like NIS2. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance frameworks.
  3. Add an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) and consider implementing a security.txt file.
  4. Create and publish a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Delska
Description
One of the biggest data center operators in the Baltic region, with over 25 years of experience. Robust security. 100% green. GDPR compliant.
Key services
Sustainable data center operations, Green energy powered hosting, GDPR compliant data services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.2.1, Material Design Icons, Google Fonts (Inter), Cloudflare DNS, Tawk.to chat widget, Cookiebot consent management, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Twitter Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain transfer lock enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • CSRF token cookie present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta (Facebook) Ads, Twitter Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Meta Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Strong cookie consent management via Cookiebot with detailed cookie disclosures.
  3. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing pixels.
  4. No explicit contact information or security policy pages found.
  5. Domain is new but business claims long experience, indicating possible rebranding or new domain.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Good use of HTTPS and domain transfer lock but DNSSEC not enabled.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 5, Material Design Icons, and Google Fonts, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, which provides performance and security benefits. The integration of multiple analytics and marketing pixels is well managed via Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization by reducing third-party scripts. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party trackers and absence of DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could be improved with enhanced DNS security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deac.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deac.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.