Skip to main content

Security report for dbr-restaurant.lv

Derbruder · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Derbruder is a small hospitality business operating a restaurant in Riga, Latvia, specializing in Japanese cuisine with a Vietnamese twist. The website presents a professional and visually appealing digital presence built on the Tilda CMS platform, featuring multimedia content such as videos and images to enhance user engagement. The business targets general consumers interested in unique gastronomic experiences and offers services including dining and phone reservations. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate small business. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dbr-restaurant.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The restaurant positions itself uniquely by combining traditional Japanese dishes with Vietnamese influences, targeting a niche market in central Riga. Its business model focuses on providing high-quality dining experiences with professional service and a cozy atmosphere. The website supports this positioning with clear branding, social media presence, and contact information. Revenue streams likely include dine-in services and possibly takeout or delivery via phone orders. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site suggests a small or medium enterprise without extensive public disclosures. The marketing ecosystem includes Google and Facebook tracking tools, indicating an active digital marketing strategy. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics is standard but requires monitoring for updates to avoid vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small hospitality website but could benefit from enhancements in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Obtain and display verified company registration and contact information to increase business credibility.
  5. Regularly update third-party scripts and monitor for security patches to reduce risk from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Derbruder
Description
Derbruder is a restaurant offering a unique gastronomic experience combining creativity and flavor, specializing in traditional Japanese dishes with a Vietnamese twist, street-food speed, and fine dining quality. Located in the heart of Vecrīga, it offers professional service and a cozy atmosphere.
Key services
Japanese and fusion cuisine dining, Professional restaurant service, Phone reservations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Fonts (Source Code Pro), Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Tilda CMS scripts and styles
Frameworks
Tilda Website Builder
Platforms
Tilda Hosting/CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed restaurant site with multimedia content including video.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information limited to phone and Instagram; no email or physical address found.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  6. Uses Tilda CMS platform with standard scripts and tracking pixels.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 1.10.2, Google Fonts, and standard Tilda scripts for animations, forms, and layout. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking user behavior and marketing effectiveness. Hosting is provided via Tilda's CDN infrastructure, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses responsive design techniques and preconnect/dns-prefetch hints for performance optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, but structured data (JSON-LD) is not present. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could be enhanced with modern accessibility and SEO best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dbr-restaurant.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dbr-restaurant.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.